[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Partition modules
From: |
Yoshinori K. Okuji |
Subject: |
Re: Partition modules |
Date: |
Thu, 18 Nov 2004 10:32:10 +0100 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.6.1 |
On Thursday 18 November 2004 04:50, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
> I do have an objection here: members like "bsd_type" don't belong in
> a generic struct, but rather in grub_partition_bsd_type. I believe
> grub_partition should be the abstraction, i.e. what defines a
> partition in the general sense. start, len, and index are obviously
> good; offset is compensating for a DOS issue, though at least it has
> (irrelevant) meaning for an Apple map... but ext_offset and these
> dos_ and bsd_ things don't belong here IMHO.
I agree with you in theory... but I guess it is a bit difficult to make
BSD disklabel independent, because it is sometimes used alone and it is
sometimes nested in other partition types. I hope Marco will find out a
good solution here.
Okuji
Re: Partition modules, Yoshinori K. Okuji, 2004/11/18
Re: Partition modules, Timothy Baldwin, 2004/11/22
Re: Partition modules, Marco Gerards, 2004/11/24