Re: [Groff] macro `st' not defined

[Werner LEMBERG]

> To avoid such similar queries in future, and in the absence of any
> definitive specification for implementing `.st', would it not be
> prudent to provide an appropriately commented interim `no-op'
> implementation;

I don't think so.  Instead, it might be useful to change the grn
implementation to avoid a call to `.st' (or only in compatibility
mode).


    Werner