[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Groff] UTP ducoment translation, bloatware, and MS Offfice
|
From: |
Richard Loken |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Groff] UTP ducoment translation, bloatware, and MS Offfice |
|
Date: |
Tue, 27 Aug 2002 10:12:33 -0600 (MDT) |
On Tue, 27 Aug 2002, Rob Scovell wrote:
> The test for bloat vis a vis groff is whether it gets more useful as it
> gets bigger -- and if it can still run in its most minimalist form on
> machines dating back to the days of Babbage.
That is an excellant measure. I have been an Emacs user for 15 years and it
runs just fine on my 16Mbyte VAXstation 3100 or my 75MHz Pentium but it is
just slightly smaller than a Lincoln Navigator. Big is not always bloat.
---
Richard Loken VE6BSV, Systems Programmer - VMS
Athabasca University
Athabasca, Alberta Canada
** address@hidden **
- Re: [Groff] UTP document translation, bloatware, and MS Offfice, (continued)
Re: [Groff] UTP ducoment translation, bloatware, and MS Offfice, Larry Kollar, 2002/08/28
Re: [Groff] UTP ducoment translation, bloatware, and MS Offfice, janez . zemva, 2002/08/27
- Re: [Groff] UTP ducoment translation, bloatware, and MS Offfice, Rob Scovell, 2002/08/27
- Re: [Groff] UTP ducoment translation, bloatware, and MS Offfice,
Richard Loken <=
- Re: [Groff] UTP ducoment translation, bloatware, and MS Offfice, Werner LEMBERG, 2002/08/27
Re: [Groff] UTP ducoment translation, bloatware, and MS Offfice, Rob Scovell, 2002/08/29