Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected)

[Tanguy LE CARROUR]

Hi Nikita,


Quoting Nikita Ronja Gillmann (2022-04-08 12:29:43)
> Tanguy LE CARROUR transcribed 6.2K bytes:
> > Hello GNUnet,
> > 
> > I'm not reporting this into the bug tracker (yet), because (good) chances
> > are the problem exists between the chair and keyboard…
> > 
> > ```
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:00.996911+0200 peerstore-sqlite-29500 ERROR Error 
> > executing SQL query: attempt to write a readonly database
> >   PRAGMA auto_vacuum=INCREMENTAL
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:00.997101+0200 peerstore-sqlite-29500 ERROR `sqlite3_step' 
> > failed at plugin_peerstore_sqlite.c:211 with error: attempt to write a 
> > readonly database
> 
> Where is the $HOME of the gnunet user? Is it writeable for you?

*ERF* the `sqlite.db` belonged to another user and was created… back
in 2020!? O_o'


> > 2022-04-07T17:14:00.997124+0200 sqlite-29500 ERROR Failed to reset sqlite 
> > statement with error: attempt to write a readonly database
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:00.999847+0200 namestore-29495 ERROR Assertion failed at 
> > sq_result_helper.c:180.
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:00.999877+0200 namestore-29495 ERROR Assertion failed at 
> > plugin_namestore_sqlite.c:537.
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:00.999891+0200 namestore-29495 ERROR Assertion failed at 
> > gnunet-service-namestore.c:1949.
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.000896+0200 transport-tcp-29503 WARNING Unexpected 
> > address length: 24 bytes
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.000925+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Assertion failed at 
> > gnunet-service-transport_validation.c:902.
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.000932+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Address with 24 bytes 
> > for plugin tcp and peer DSTJ is malformed
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.000938+0200 transport-tcp-29503 WARNING Unexpected 
> > address length: 12 bytes
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.000942+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Assertion failed at 
> > gnunet-service-transport_validation.c:902.
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.000947+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Address with 12 bytes 
> > for plugin tcp and peer DSTJ is malformed
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.001095+0200 transport-tcp-29503 WARNING Unexpected 
> > address length: 24 bytes
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.001105+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Assertion failed at 
> > gnunet-service-transport_validation.c:902.
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.001110+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Address with 24 bytes 
> > for plugin tcp and peer V8XX is malformed
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.001114+0200 transport-tcp-29503 WARNING Unexpected 
> > address length: 12 bytes
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.001118+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Assertion failed at 
> > gnunet-service-transport_validation.c:902.
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.001125+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Address with 12 bytes 
> > for plugin tcp and peer V8XX is malformed
> > 2022-04-07T17:14:01.005084+0200 nat-29505 ERROR UPnP enabled in 
> > configuration, but UPnP client `upnpc` command not found, disabling UPnP
> 
> I assume that you have upnpc(-mini?) as dependency in the guix package.
> When you look at the C code in src/nat/ you'll see 2 files which you
> need to patch for them to work for Guix (same applies for the cases
> where iptables, ip6tables, and ip binaries are used).

Correct. `miniupnpc` is an `input`, not a `propagated-input`,
so I will have to patch the files using it. Thanks for pointing out!

I'll submit a patch for the package definition.

In the meantime, I installed `miniupnpc` to make it available for `gnunet`
to use… unfortunately, I now have the following warning:

```
2022-04-08T15:50:35.608148+0200 nat-16852 WARNING upnpc failed to create port 
mapping
2022-04-08T15:50:35.608229+0200 nat-16852 WARNING upnpc failed to create port 
mapping
```

But, I guess, WARNING is better than ERROR! :-)

Cheers,

-- 
Tanguy