[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected)
From: |
Nikita Ronja Gillmann |
Subject: |
Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected) |
Date: |
Fri, 8 Apr 2022 12:29:43 +0200 |
Hi,
Tanguy LE CARROUR transcribed 6.2K bytes:
> Hello GNUnet,
>
> I'm not reporting this into the bug tracker (yet), because (good) chances
> are the problem exists between the chair and keyboard…
>
> ```
> 2022-04-07T17:14:00.996911+0200 peerstore-sqlite-29500 ERROR Error executing
> SQL query: attempt to write a readonly database
> PRAGMA auto_vacuum=INCREMENTAL
> 2022-04-07T17:14:00.997101+0200 peerstore-sqlite-29500 ERROR `sqlite3_step'
> failed at plugin_peerstore_sqlite.c:211 with error: attempt to write a
> readonly database
Where is the $HOME of the gnunet user? Is it writeable for you?
> 2022-04-07T17:14:00.997124+0200 sqlite-29500 ERROR Failed to reset sqlite
> statement with error: attempt to write a readonly database
> 2022-04-07T17:14:00.999847+0200 namestore-29495 ERROR Assertion failed at
> sq_result_helper.c:180.
> 2022-04-07T17:14:00.999877+0200 namestore-29495 ERROR Assertion failed at
> plugin_namestore_sqlite.c:537.
> 2022-04-07T17:14:00.999891+0200 namestore-29495 ERROR Assertion failed at
> gnunet-service-namestore.c:1949.
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.000896+0200 transport-tcp-29503 WARNING Unexpected
> address length: 24 bytes
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.000925+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Assertion failed at
> gnunet-service-transport_validation.c:902.
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.000932+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Address with 24 bytes
> for plugin tcp and peer DSTJ is malformed
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.000938+0200 transport-tcp-29503 WARNING Unexpected
> address length: 12 bytes
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.000942+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Assertion failed at
> gnunet-service-transport_validation.c:902.
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.000947+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Address with 12 bytes
> for plugin tcp and peer DSTJ is malformed
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.001095+0200 transport-tcp-29503 WARNING Unexpected
> address length: 24 bytes
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.001105+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Assertion failed at
> gnunet-service-transport_validation.c:902.
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.001110+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Address with 24 bytes
> for plugin tcp and peer V8XX is malformed
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.001114+0200 transport-tcp-29503 WARNING Unexpected
> address length: 12 bytes
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.001118+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Assertion failed at
> gnunet-service-transport_validation.c:902.
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.001125+0200 transport-29503 ERROR Address with 12 bytes
> for plugin tcp and peer V8XX is malformed
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.005084+0200 nat-29505 ERROR UPnP enabled in
> configuration, but UPnP client `upnpc` command not found, disabling UPnP
I assume that you have upnpc(-mini?) as dependency in the guix package.
When you look at the C code in src/nat/ you'll see 2 files which you need to
patch for them to work for Guix (same applies for the cases where iptables,
ip6tables, and ip binaries are used).
> 2022-04-07T17:14:01.099784+0200 hostlist-29482 WARNING Download of hostlist
> from `https://gnunet.io/hostlist' failed: `SSL peer certificate or SSH remote
> key was not OK'
> 2022-04-07T17:14:02.015851+0200 hostlist-29482 WARNING Download of hostlist
> from `https://gnunet.io/hostlist' failed: `SSL peer certificate or SSH remote
> key was not OK'
> ```
>
> On computer_2, the logs contain the following:
>
> ```
> 2022-04-07T19:18:24.601705+0200 hostlist-2604 WARNING Download of hostlist
> from `https://gnunet.io/hostlist' failed: `SSL peer certificate or SSH remote
> key was not OK'
> 2022-04-07T19:18:24.603510+0200 nat-2625 ERROR UPnP enabled in configuration,
> but UPnP client `upnpc` command not found, disabling UPnP
> 2022-04-07T19:18:25.597153+0200 hostlist-2604 WARNING Download of hostlist
> from `https://gnunet.io/hostlist' failed: `SSL peer certificate or SSH remote
> key was not OK'
> 2022-04-07T19:18:27.597664+0200 hostlist-2604 WARNING Download of hostlist
> from `https://gnunet.io/hostlist' failed: `SSL peer certificate or SSH remote
> key was not OK'
> 2022-04-07T19:18:31.628126+0200 transport-tcp-2621 WARNING Unexpected address
> length: 24 bytes
> 2022-04-07T19:18:31.628416+0200 transport-2621 ERROR Assertion failed at
> gnunet-service-transport_validation.c:902.
> 2022-04-07T19:18:31.628470+0200 transport-2621 ERROR Address with 24 bytes
> for plugin tcp and peer DSTJ is malformed
> 2022-04-07T19:18:31.628520+0200 transport-tcp-2621 WARNING Unexpected address
> length: 12 bytes
> 2022-04-07T19:18:31.628559+0200 transport-2621 ERROR Assertion failed at
> gnunet-service-transport_validation.c:902.
> 2022-04-07T19:18:31.628597+0200 transport-2621 ERROR Address with 12 bytes
> for plugin tcp and peer DSTJ is malformed
> 2022-04-07T19:18:31.630577+0200 transport-tcp-2621 WARNING Unexpected address
> length: 24 bytes
> 2022-04-07T19:18:31.630668+0200 transport-2621 ERROR Assertion failed at
> gnunet-service-transport_validation.c:902.
> 2022-04-07T19:18:31.630721+0200 transport-2621 ERROR Address with 24 bytes
> for plugin tcp and peer V8XX is malformed
> 2022-04-07T19:18:31.630776+0200 transport-tcp-2621 WARNING Unexpected address
> length: 12 bytes
> 2022-04-07T19:18:31.630826+0200 transport-2621 ERROR Assertion failed at
> gnunet-service-transport_validation.c:902.
> 2022-04-07T19:18:31.630882+0200 transport-2621 ERROR Address with 12 bytes
> for plugin tcp and peer V8XX is malformed
> ```
>
- GNUnet Name System not working (as expected), Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2022/04/08
- Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected),
Nikita Ronja Gillmann <=
- Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected), Nikita Ronja Gillmann, 2022/04/08
- Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected), Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2022/04/08
- Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected), Schanzenbach, Martin, 2022/04/09
- Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected), Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2022/04/11
- Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected), Maxime Devos, 2022/04/11
- Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected), Schanzenbach, Martin, 2022/04/11
- Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected), Schanzenbach, Martin, 2022/04/09
- Re: GNUnet Name System not working (as expected), Tanguy LE CARROUR, 2022/04/11