Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUnet project & organizational challenges

[Christian Grothoff]

I think that's a missunderstanding: after the discussion here I'm not
sure anyone actually intended to suggest the creation of a COOP/eG. At
least I read the "cooperative" discussion more as a thought experiment
on how to cooperate to enable developers to spend more time on the
project, and for that to consider alternative lifestyles / forms of
organization.

But like you, I also first thought that creating a COOP was the
suggestion (and only the discussion here clarified this a bit for me,
but regardless the outcome of the discussion remains highly intangible).

Regardless, I agree with you that creating a COOP/eG is not the right
move for GNUnet (at least as an organizational form for the overall
project).

On 6/26/19 9:36 PM, Fabian Gerlach wrote:
> Hello again,
> 
> my 2 cents:
> I'm for keeping the organizational form as it is (eV), because the change 
> from eV to COOP/eG goes hand in hand with a shift away from the actual matter 
> (the development of GNUnet, Freedom in networking) and towards making profit 
> (with GNUnet), and that would be bad.
> 
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> Fabian
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
>

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature