Re: [GNUnet-developers] GNUnet project & organizational challenges

[Schanzenbach, Martin]

As I understood this really has nothing to do with the eV or the
organisational form (in legal terms).

It was more related to how to organise processes within the GNUnet 
project/community.

Regarding the eV/making profit: AFAIK the GUNnet eV is already _for_ profit 
even if it does
not actively accumulate any :)

> On 27. Jun 2019, at 17:30, address@hidden wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I don't understand why this is open for discussion, as it seems.
> Exploration should be up to the listed members of the eV, which is one of the 
> points
> exclusive to the eV where a difference of groups makes sense.
> 
> I was not around, but I was told it's just exploration atm.
> 
> Fabian Gerlach transcribed 653 bytes:
>> Hello again,
>> 
>> my 2 cents:
>> I'm for keeping the organizational form as it is (eV), because the change 
>> from eV to COOP/eG goes hand in hand with a shift away from the actual 
>> matter (the development of GNUnet, Freedom in networking) and towards making 
>> profit (with GNUnet), and that would be bad.
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Best regards,
>> Fabian
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> GNUnet-developers mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers
> 
> _______________________________________________
> GNUnet-developers mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnunet-developers

signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP