Re: [GNUnet-developers] A Graph Database on top GNUnet (take two)

[Christian Grothoff]

On 3/24/19 9:37 AM, IC Rainbow wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 23, 2019 at 4:44 PM Christian Grothoff
> <address@hidden> wrote:
> 
>> Please do NOT use a TXT record. This part of what you describe fits what
>> I had in mind for GNS/FS integration, but I would define a new record
>> type, say GNUNET-FSURI or something like that.  It's pretty easy to add
>> new record types to GNS, we don't need IETF approval, and we have 4
>> billion values available. So no reason to overload TXT like it is done
>> in DNS. We can do better ;-).
> 
> Can we also have types for CADET ports and other major parts/services
> of GNUnet base package?

A CADET port itself is not so useful, you'd need the combination of peer
ID + CADET port. So if you have an application that runs some service on
such a CADET port, it would indeed make sense to define a record type
for that particular application containing the PID+PORT.