Re: [GNUnet-developers] gentoo, last tweaks and questions

[Christian Grothoff]

On 04/10/2016 08:57 PM, Nils Gillmann wrote:
>> Well, 'bootstrap' is only needed if/when building from Subversion. Once
>> there is a release, this is no longer required.
> 
> I have talked with lynX, and also gnunet devs afterwards, and
> I'll fix packages to svn numbers now as users will get a better
> impression with current release other than 0.10.1. When the next
> release candidate comes out I can include it in gentoo, but there
> shouldn't be much difference between release candidate and the
> time it was released (svn-number), or am I wrong?

Correct, so far at the time of the release, the release always matched
exactly some SVN HEAD revision.

> My personal experience of 0.10.1 vs 37011 and checkouts before
> that was drastically different, 0.10.1 has problems which are no
> longer existent in later numbers.

Yeah, about 300 or so according to the bugtracker ;-).

> I'll call SVN number 37011 gnunet-{gtk-}0.10.2_rc2 in gentoo.
> Maybe i can communicate the same with guix, we'll see. if I can't
> i'll still manage to express it somewhere.

That should be fine.

signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature