[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Freenet 0.5
From: |
Jason Gilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [GNUnet-developers] Freenet 0.5 |
Date: |
Sat, 2 Nov 2002 14:57:19 -0600 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5.1i |
On Fri, Nov 01, 2002 at 03:44:17PM -0800, Tracy R Reed wrote:
> numbers, all manner of java related problems (a problem gnunetd has
> obviously learned to avoid since it is written in C) such as thread
> madness and runaway cpu useage, general complication which is a serious
> ease of use issue,
I develop w/ java every day on non-trivial apps. I can remember the last
performance problem related to java itself. These (like most current java
performance complaints) are more likely developer issues.
jason
--
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not
sure about the former" - Albert Einstein
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Freenet 0.5, Igor Wronsky, 2002/11/01
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Freenet 0.5, Glenn McGrath, 2002/11/01
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Freenet 0.5, LCID Fire, 2002/11/01
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Freenet 0.5, Tracy R Reed, 2002/11/01
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Freenet 0.5,
Jason Gilbert <=
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Freenet 0.5, Krista Bennett, 2002/11/02
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Freenet 0.5, Brett Wooldridge, 2002/11/02
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Java (was Freenet 0.5), Blake Matheny, 2002/11/02
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Java (was Freenet 0.5), Brett Wooldridge, 2002/11/02
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Java (was Freenet 0.5), Krista Bennett, 2002/11/02
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Java (was Freenet 0.5), LCID Fire, 2002/11/03
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Freenet 0.5, Glenn McGrath, 2002/11/02
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Freenet 0.5, Brett Wooldridge, 2002/11/02
- Re: [GNUnet-developers] Freenet 0.5, Krista Bennett, 2002/11/02