[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Comments -- Copyright policy
From: |
Davi Leal |
Subject: |
Re: Comments -- Copyright policy |
Date: |
Mon, 7 May 2007 14:03:24 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.5 |
a) as the FSF does:
@copyright 2007 GNU Herds Free Software Association
b) as the Linux kernel does:
@copyright 2007 Klaus Weiss <klaus dot weiss at nanet dot at>
2007 Name Here <name dot here at __ dot __>
...
Ref.: http://lwn.net/Articles/206065/
License: GPL v3, when be ready
Copyright policy: (a), (b), or any other?
I think the (a) licensing model requires signing paper. There is not formal
Association, at least yet. Anyway (a) gets complex.
I propose go with the (b) model and so cut down the work needed to maintain
the association operation.
Davi
- Comments on the new architecture, Davi Leal, 2007/05/06
- Re: Comments on the new architecture, Klaus Weiss, 2007/05/06
- Re: taking a break, Davi Leal, 2007/05/06
- Re: Comments -- With or without Microsoft server support, Davi Leal, 2007/05/06
- Re: Comments -- flexibility vs complexity, Davi Leal, 2007/05/06
- Re: Comments -- Copyright policy,
Davi Leal <=
- Re: Comments on the new architecture, Klaus Weiss, 2007/05/07
- Re: Comments on the new architecture, Klaus Weiss, 2007/05/07
- Re: Comments -- UML 2.x (XMI format), Davi Leal, 2007/05/07
- Re: Comments -- Smarty, Davi Leal, 2007/05/07
- Re: Comments -- Persistence Framework, Davi Leal, 2007/05/07
- Re: Comments on the new architecture, Davi Leal, 2007/05/08
- Re: Comments -- The format of the License and Copyright text, Davi Leal, 2007/05/08
- Re: Comments -- Indentation, Davi Leal, 2007/05/08
- Re: Comments -- Indentation, Antenore Gatta, 2007/05/08
- Re: Comments -- Indentation = TAB characters, Davi Leal, 2007/05/08