[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:59:31 -0700 |
> > The regressions are deterministic. However if there are two
>
> Or they used to be. I can reproduce what Nicolet described by running:
> gq -l games/nngs/Lazarus-gnugo-3.1.31-200204140254.sgf -L 90 -r 6 -t -w
>
> If I change the "6" to "5", GNU Go gets a different status for the P10
> group.
> I have tracked this down to a side effect of different hash collisions
> with the killer move heuristic by Evan. (Eventually, find_defense()
> returns a different move to owl.)
I don't see how this is relevant. Of course changing the random seed
can give different answers and this is as it should be.
But the function gtp_reg_genmove explicitly sets the random seed to 0.
So both regression runs were done with the same random seed 0.
But I tend to think that Stephane's observation that this test
result depends on the random seed makes the spurious change seem
less significant even if the exact mechanism is unclear.
Dan
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, (continued)
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, bump, 2003/08/06
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, bump, 2003/08/06
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, Arend Bayer, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, bump, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, Stéphane Nicolet, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, bump, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, Arend Bayer, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch,
bump <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, Heikki Levanto, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, Gunnar Farneback, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, bump, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, Arend Bayer, 2003/08/11