[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch
From: |
bump |
Subject: |
Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Aug 2003 11:29:58 -0700 |
> Previously the Zobrist numbers never had any effect on the reading
> (except in the extremely unlikely occurence of a board hash
> collision). The new cache together with Evan's killer heuristic
> changes this. The Zobrist numbers affect the placement within the hash
> table implementing the cache. More to the point they affect which
> positions/read routines/targets/komasters compete about the same
> entries in the hash table. Due to the design of the new cache, it
> doesn't matter much with respect to performance if some cached result
> has to move out of the way, but it can affect the killer heuristic and
> thereby the result of the reading.
OK ... in any case Arend was right when he wrote that the problem
isn't with the cosmic patch.
Dan
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, (continued)
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, bump, 2003/08/06
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, bump, 2003/08/06
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, Arend Bayer, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, bump, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, Stéphane Nicolet, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, bump, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, Arend Bayer, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, bump, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, Heikki Levanto, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, Gunnar Farneback, 2003/08/10
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch,
bump <=
- Re: [gnugo-devel] cosmic patch, Arend Bayer, 2003/08/11