[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of G
|
From: |
Dmitry Alexandrov |
|
Subject: |
Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 05 Nov 2019 12:54:36 +0300 |
|
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
John Sullivan <address@hidden> wrote:
> address@hidden (Alfred M. Szmidt) writes:
>
>> Legal topics are off-topic on gnu-system-discuss, please direct them to the
>> FSF which is responsible for enforcing the GNU GPL for the GNU project:
>> address@hidden.
>
> Actually address@hidden please
Which is not a public mailing list.
IMHO, that secrecy does nothing to FSF and free software but harm. What one
having a licensing question would actually do is to go elsewhere, most probably
to mailto:address@hidden or https://opensource.stackexchange.com.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Re: Why will no-one sue GrSecurity for their blatant GPL violation (of GCC and the linux kernel)?, Paolo Bonzini, 2019/11/05