Archives are refreshed every 30 minutes - for details, please visit the main index.
You can also download the archives in mbox format.

gnu-arch-users (date)

[Thread Index][Top][All Lists]

Advanced

[Prev Period]

Last Modified: Sun Aug 31 2003 16:00:21 -0400 Messages in reverse chronological order

[Next Period]

---

• August 31, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, Tom Lord, 16:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, Andrew Suffield, 15:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, Douglas Philips, 15:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, Karel Gardas, 14:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, Robert Anderson, 14:18
  • [Gnu-arch-users] RE: [OT] fixing emacs, Barak Zalstein, 05:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Ollivier Robert, 04:03
• August 30, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes, Tom Lord, 20:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] recent changes / `grab' command, Tom Lord, 14:15
  • [Fwd: Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: towards standards specifications], Robert Collins, 05:57
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] fixing emacs, Tom Lord, 02:49
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] fixing emacs, Stephen J. Turnbull, 02:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Robert Anderson, 02:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Architectural renovation, Stephen J. Turnbull, 02:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Robert Anderson, 01:44
• August 29, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] today's merges, Tom Lord, 20:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnu mail servers, Tom Lord, 20:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnu mail servers, Miles Bader, 19:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Wiki's new home, Tom Lord, 19:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Wiki's new home, Talli Somekh, 17:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Using Arch to track non-Arch upstreams, Miles Bader, 16:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, Andrew Suffield, 16:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, Andrew Suffield, 16:37
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] fixing emacs (was Re: Architectural renovation), Tom Lord, 14:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, John Goerzen, 14:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, Jan Hudec, 13:55
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Forward: .d files are "apparent source files" by default, Stig Brautaset, 12:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Douglas Philips, 12:44
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, John Goerzen, 12:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Forward: .d files are "apparent source files" by default, Douglas Philips, 12:36
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Using Arch to track non-Arch upstreams, John Goerzen, 12:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, MJ Ray, 12:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Architectural renovation, Colin Walters, 11:42
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Arch Wiki's new home, Talli Somekh, 11:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Andrew Suffield, 11:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: a contrib directory, Alexander Deruwe, 10:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: a contrib directory, Tom Lord, 10:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Robert Anderson, 10:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, Robert Anderson, 10:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: a contrib directory, Jonas Diemer, 08:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: a contrib directory, Alexander Deruwe, 07:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: a contrib directory, Harald Meland, 06:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, Jan Hudec, 06:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Using Arch to track non-Arch upstreams, Jan Hudec, 05:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: a contrib directory, Jan Hudec, 05:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Alexander Deruwe, 04:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, Bruce Stephens, 04:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Alexander Deruwe, 04:39
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, Miles Bader, 04:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, MJ Ray, 04:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Bruce Stephens, 04:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, MJ Ray, 04:28
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, Bruce Stephens, 03:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Stephen J. Turnbull, 02:08
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] Architectural renovation, Stephen J. Turnbull, 02:03
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 01:35
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Juri Linkov, 01:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Architectural renovation, Stephen J. Turnbull, 00:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Architectural renovation, Tom Lord, 00:09
• August 28, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Ethan Benson, 23:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, Ethan Benson, 23:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Architectural renovation, Stephen J. Turnbull, 23:36
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Using Arch to track non-Arch upstreams, Miles Bader, 23:18
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Using Arch to track non-Arch upstreams, John Goerzen, 22:56
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: (no subject), Miles Bader, 22:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, Zack Brown, 22:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: recent user-visible changes pushed, Stephen J. Turnbull, 22:27
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Jason McCarty, 22:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Stephen J. Turnbull, 22:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: a contrib directory, Tom Lord, 21:57
  • [Gnu-arch-users] (no subject), Maksim Lin, 21:41
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, Miles Bader, 21:27
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, Mark A. Flacy, 21:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, John Goerzen, 21:20
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 21:12
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: a contrib directory, Tez Kamihira, 21:04
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Using Arch to track non-Arch upstreams, Mark A. Flacy, 21:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, Tom Lord, 20:20
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagging-method explicit implementation, Maksim Lin, 20:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Mark A. Flacy, 19:58
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: today's merges, John Goerzen, 19:43
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Using Arch to track non-Arch upstreams, John Goerzen, 19:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 8100 default input mode, John Goerzen, 19:24
  • [Gnu-arch-users] latest changes on tla--devo--1.1 and docs-tla--devo--1.0, Tom Lord, 19:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] 8100 default input mode, Tom Lord, 19:13
  • a contrib directory (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion), Tom Lord, 19:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Denys Duchier, 17:55
  • [Gnu-arch-users] 8100 default input mode, John Goerzen, 17:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Bruce Stephens, 17:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Jonas Diemer, 17:18
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Talli Somekh, 17:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Jan Hudec, 16:23
  • [Gnu-arch-users] file and directory restrictions, Zack Brown, 15:31
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: gnu mail servers, John Goerzen, 15:04
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, John Goerzen, 15:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Jason McCarty, 14:26
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Tutorial format, Zack Brown, 13:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Jason McCarty, 13:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, MJ Ray, 13:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Tom Lord, 13:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Jonas Diemer, 13:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, MJ Ray, 13:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Architectural renovation, Tom Lord, 12:49
  • [Gnu-arch-users] More merges on tla--devo--1.1, Tom Lord, 12:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Architectural renovation, Andrew Suffield, 12:41
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] Architectural renovation [was: funding free software R&D], Tom Lord, 12:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Zack Brown, 12:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Jonas Diemer, 12:05
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] RE: [OT] Architectural renovation [was: funding free software R&D], Andrew Suffield, 12:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ATTN: who wants to host the wiki?, Paul Hedderly, 12:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Mark A. Flacy, 11:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: recent user-visible changes pushed, Jason McCarty, 11:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Jason McCarty, 11:37
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Talli Somekh, 11:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Forward: .d files are "apparent source files" by default, Jan Hudec, 11:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Robert Anderson, 11:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Jan Hudec, 11:11
  • RE: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Bill Petheram, 10:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: recent user-visible changes pushed, Zack Brown, 10:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Bruce Stephens, 10:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: recent user-visible changes pushed, Tez Kamihira, 10:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Robert Anderson, 10:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Robert Anderson, 09:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Robert Anderson, 09:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Robert Anderson, 09:35
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Neil Stevens, 09:27
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] Architectural renovation, Stephen J. Turnbull, 09:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Architectural renovation, Stephen J. Turnbull, 09:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Alexander Deruwe, 09:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: recent user-visible changes pushed, Zack Brown, 09:05
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Forward: .d files are "apparent source files" by default, Samium Gromoff, 08:51
  • RE: [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Bill Petheram, 08:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Damien Elmes, 08:02
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tagging-method explicit implementation, Bruce Stephens, 07:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Jan Hudec, 07:05
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Maksim Lin, 06:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 06:27
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: towards standards specifications, Miles Bader, 05:26
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [OT] Architectural renovation [was: funding free software R&D], Miles Bader, 05:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: towards standards specifications, Andrew Suffield, 05:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Architectural renovation [was: funding free software R&D], Andrew Suffield, 05:14
  • [Gnu-arch-users] RE: [OT] Architectural renovation [was: funding free software R&D], Barak Zalstein, 05:07
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla bash completion, Jonas Diemer, 04:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: recent user-visible changes pushed, Stig Brautaset, 02:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] list archives, Stephen J. Turnbull, 02:51
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] Architectural renovation [was: funding free software R&D], Stephen J. Turnbull, 02:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Zack Brown, 01:37
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Douglas Philips, 00:16
• August 27, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] towards standards specifications, MJ Ray, 22:54
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: towards standards specifications, Miles Bader, 22:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] list archives, Jonathan Walther, 22:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] towards standards specifications, Tom Lord, 22:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] towards standards specifications, Jason McCarty, 22:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent user-visible changes pushed, Zack Brown, 20:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] towards standards specifications, MJ Ray, 20:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] list archives, Jonathan Walther, 20:07
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: list archives, Miles Bader, 20:05
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: list archives, Miles Bader, 20:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent user-visible changes pushed, Tom Lord, 19:40
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: my tla archive -- now publicly available!, Miles Bader, 19:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] list archives, Zack Brown, 19:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] my tla archive -- now publicly available!, Tom Lord, 19:09
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 19:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent user-visible changes pushed, Tom Lord, 18:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] list archives, Tom Lord, 18:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: list archives, Andreas Fuchs, 18:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] list archives, Zack Brown, 18:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] recent user-visible changes pushed, Zack Brown, 18:40
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: public access to my archive, Tom Lord, 18:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] my tla archive -- now publicly available!, Ollivier Robert, 18:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Zack Brown, 18:20
  • [Gnu-arch-users] recent user-visible changes pushed, Tom Lord, 18:16
  • [Gnu-arch-users] list archives, Tom Lord, 17:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] funding free software R&D, Tom Lord, 16:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Tom Lord, 16:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Where is James Blackwell?, Miles Bader, 16:49
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Tom Lord, 16:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Jason McCarty, 15:31
  • [Gnu-arch-users] towards standards specifications, Tom Lord, 13:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Where is James Blackwell?, Zack Brown, 12:19
  • [Gnu-arch-users] update web site to reflect new mailing list, Zack Brown, 12:13
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Tom Lord, 11:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] tla with sftp, duchier, 09:12
  • [Gnu-arch-users] my tla archive -- now publicly available!, Miles Bader, 06:49
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 05:08
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Miles Bader, 01:16
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Specifying protocols [was: the dangers of no reply-to munging], Stephen J. Turnbull, 01:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Robert Collins, 00:57
• August 26, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 23:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Stephen J. Turnbull, 22:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Tom Lord, 22:50
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Miles Bader, 22:30
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 22:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 21:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 21:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Tom Lord, 18:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 17:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Adam Sampson, 13:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 11:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Tom Lord, 11:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Tom Lord, 10:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla gui prototype, Michael Grubb, 10:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Mark A. Flacy, 09:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 09:17
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message), Miles Bader, 08:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 07:17
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 06:15
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message), Karel Gardas, 06:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 05:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], MJ Ray, 05:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 05:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 05:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message), Miles Bader, 05:07
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message), Karel Gardas, 04:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message), Karel Gardas, 04:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why MUAs remain broken, Stephen J. Turnbull, 04:44
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message), Miles Bader, 04:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jonathan Walther, 04:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?, Mark A. Flacy, 04:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message), Karel Gardas, 04:04
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Federico Di Gregorio, 03:10
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message), Miles Bader, 03:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message), Momchil Velikov, 02:51
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 02:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Federico Di Gregorio, 02:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Juri Linkov, 01:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Juri Linkov, 01:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Juri Linkov, 01:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Juri Linkov, 01:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Jonathan Walther, 01:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change?, Stephen J. Turnbull, 01:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] interesting thing about GNU dot ORG Reply-To: munging, Stephen J. Turnbull, 01:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] funding free software R&D, Stephen J. Turnbull, 00:47
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 00:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Mark A. Flacy, 00:10
• August 25, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message), Miles Bader, 23:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 23:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jan Hudec, 23:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Jan Hudec, 23:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 22:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jonathan Walther, 21:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why MUAs remain broken, Jonathan Walther, 21:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Tupshin Harper, 20:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 20:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] funding free software R&D, Andrew Suffield, 20:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 20:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Reply-To munging now considered safe and sane, Andrew Suffield, 19:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Tupshin Harper, 19:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 19:23
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tcl gui, Talli Somekh, 19:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] some lkml discussion of a graphical merge tool, Zack Brown, 19:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 19:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] interesting thing about GNU dot ORG Reply-To: munging, Jonathan Walther, 19:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Robert Collins, 18:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Reply-To munging now considered safe and sane, wave++, 18:24
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why MUAs remain broken, Stephen J. Turnbull, 18:23
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Stephen J. Turnbull, 17:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] funding free software R&D, Stephen J. Turnbull, 17:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] question about splitting categories, Tom Lord, 17:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla gui prototype, Zack Brown, 17:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] interesting thing about GNU dot ORG Reply-To: munging, MJ Ray, 16:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla gui prototype, Benjamin Bytheway, 16:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Jonathan Walther, 15:36
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Reply-To munging now considered safe and sane, Jonathan Walther, 15:06
  • [Gnu-arch-users] question about splitting categories, list-arch-users, 14:57
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 14:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Andrew Suffield, 13:48
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Why is "popular" software hard to change? [was some damn OT thread], Tom Lord, 13:11
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla gui prototype, Maksim Lin, 10:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message), Gergely Nagy, 10:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla's what-changed (missing explicit tag for file (try tree-lint) error message), Karel Gardas, 09:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ATTN: three policy statements about reply-to merging, Tupshin Harper, 08:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Collins, 06:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Collins, 06:27
  • [Gnu-arch-users] gnu mail servers, wave++, 04:52
  • Re: cvs2arch (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] an hack.. one night long), wave++, 04:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 04:26
• August 24, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Some "How Do I" questions, Miles Bader, 22:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Tupshin Harper, 20:55
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ATTN: three policy statements about reply-to merging, Tom Lord, 20:50
  • [Gnu-arch-users] ATTN: three policy statements about reply-to merging, Tom Lord, 20:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Miles Bader, 20:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] interesting thing about GNU dot ORG Reply-To: munging, Ethan Benson, 20:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] future of the wiki, Jason McCarty, 19:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Tom Lord, 19:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Tom Lord, 19:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Miles Bader, 18:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hmmm., Miles Bader, 18:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Tupshin Harper, 18:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Tom Lord, 18:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Miles Bader, 18:24
  • [Gnu-arch-users] preparing to stress test tla with linux-2.5, Tupshin Harper, 17:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch taglines for emacs, Tom Lord, 15:44
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch taglines for emacs, Jonathan Walther, 15:33
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch on cygwin?, Stig Brautaset, 15:11
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch taglines for emacs, Tom Lord, 14:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hmmm., Zack Brown, 14:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: future of the wiki, Talli Somekh, 14:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hmmm., Miles Egan, 13:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] future of the wiki, Tom Lord, 13:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Jonathan Walther, 12:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hmmm., Tom Lord, 11:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 11:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Douglas Philips, 10:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Maksim Lin, 07:56
  • [Gnu-arch-users] interesting thing about GNU dot ORG Reply-To: munging, Jonathan Walther, 07:06
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] minor patch-log file format questions, Miles Bader, 06:59
  • [Gnu-arch-users] arch on cygwin?, Barak Zalstein, 06:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ATTN: any missing bugs?/patches?, Bruce Stephens, 05:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Ollivier Robert, 04:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hmmm., Miles Bader, 04:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] hmmm., Miles Egan, 02:23
  • [Gnu-arch-users] hmmm., Tom Lord, 01:02
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Jonathan Walther, 00:24
• August 23, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Jonathan Walther, 22:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH 0.0.1, Tez Kamihira, 22:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: archive order?, Tom Lord, 21:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 21:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Tom Lord, 21:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] archive order?, Tom Lord, 21:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: archive order?, Stig Brautaset, 20:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Jonathan Walther, 20:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Egan, 20:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] archive order?, Jan Hudec, 20:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Tom Lord, 19:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Egan, 18:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, wave++, 18:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Ethan Benson, 18:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Tom Lord, 17:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline considered harmful?, Stig Brautaset, 17:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 17:00
  • Re: cvs2arch (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] an hack.. one night long), Tom Lord, 16:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, wave++, 16:13
  • Re: cvs2arch (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] an hack.. one night long), wave++, 16:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] archive order?, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 15:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] archive order?, Miles Bader, 15:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] archive order?, Tom Lord, 14:53
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Tom Lord, 14:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Tom Lord, 14:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Miles Bader, 14:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] funding free software R&D, Tom Lord, 14:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ATTN: any missing bugs?/patches?, Tom Lord, 14:41
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [Bug-gnu-arch] [bug #4935] Add '--tag TAG' option to the ' tla add-tag' command, Miles Bader, 14:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Andrew Suffield, 13:56
  • Re: cvs2arch (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] an hack.. one night long), Jan Harkes, 13:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] minor patch-log file format questions, Tom Lord, 13:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Bruce Stephens, 13:21
  • Re: cvs2arch (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] an hack.. one night long), Tom Lord, 13:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Why MUAs remain broken (was reply-to foo) to the old mailing list, Andrew Suffield, 12:45
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Christian Ullrich, 12:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, wave++, 12:14
  • cvs2arch (was Re: [Gnu-arch-users] an hack.. one night long), wave++, 12:14
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Why MUAs remain broken (was reply-to foo) to the old mailing list, Tom Lord, 11:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Stephen J. Turnbull, 10:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Stephen J. Turnbull, 10:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Stephen J. Turnbull, 10:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Adding 'checkouts' to tla (was: file histories), Maksim Lin, 10:20
  • [Gnu-arch-users] archive order?, Maksim Lin, 10:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH 0.0.1, Gergely Nagy, 10:11
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tagline considered harmful?, Maksim Lin, 09:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hooks and remote archives, Ethan Benson, 08:38
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Stig Brautaset, 06:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some "How Do I" questions, Andrew Suffield, 06:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] hooks and remote archives, Andrew Suffield, 06:38
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 06:26
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: how to tag directory using tagline?, Stig Brautaset, 05:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some "How Do I" questions, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 05:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 04:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 04:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Stephen J. Turnbull, 03:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Stephen J. Turnbull, 03:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] an hack.. one night long, wave++, 03:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] funding free software R&D, Stephen J. Turnbull, 03:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] change to email list handling and merge-fest, Miles Bader, 02:09
• August 22, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jonathan Walther, 23:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Mark A. Flacy, 23:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] minor patch-log file format questions, Miles Bader, 23:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] hooks and remote archives, Miles Bader, 23:18
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Some "How Do I" questions, Miles Bader, 23:18
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 22:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hooks and remote archives, Jan Hudec, 21:25
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Jan Hudec, 20:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Ganesh Sittampalam, 20:44
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: how to tag directory using tagline?, Miles Bader, 20:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Christian Ullrich, 20:40
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Slow mailinglist, DNS problems?, Miles Bader, 20:37
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] hooks and remote archives, Bruce Stephens, 20:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] hooks and remote archives, Miles Egan, 19:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ATTN: who wants to host the wiki?, Jan Hudec, 19:18
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Juri Linkov, 19:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] hooks and remote archives, Tom Lord, 19:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] hooks and remote archives, Miles Bader, 18:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Some "How Do I" questions, Jason McCarty, 18:29
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 18:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 17:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] japanese translation of the arch home page, Tez Kamihira, 17:47
  • [Gnu-arch-users] something _interesting_ for (Re: ... no reply-to munging ...), Tom Lord, 17:41
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Old List, Michael Grubb, 17:27
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 17:21
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] problem with tla on freebsd, list-arch-users, 17:07
  • [Gnu-arch-users] ATTN: any missing bugs?/patches?, Tom Lord, 16:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jonathan Walther, 16:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] minor patch-log file format questions, Tom Lord, 15:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ATTN: who wants to host the wiki?, Michael Grubb, 15:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 15:00
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Some "How Do I" questions, John Goerzen, 14:26
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] hooks and remote archives, Alexander Deruwe, 13:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 12:58
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 12:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Robert Anderson, 12:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: ATTN: who wants to host the wiki?, Miles Egan, 12:01
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Some "How Do I" questions, Miles Bader, 11:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] japanese translation of the arch home page, Tom Lord, 11:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] hooks and remote archives, Miles Egan, 11:14
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 10:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 10:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, markj, 10:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 10:15
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Can we stop the effing discussion about reply-to munging?, Mark A. Flacy, 09:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] the dangers of no reply-to munging, Jan Harkes, 08:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Ganesh Sittampalam, 08:30
  • [Gnu-arch-users] defining tags with add-tag, Benjamin Bytheway, 08:26
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] error in tree-lint, Tom Lord, 08:19
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 07:09
  • [Gnu-arch-users] minor patch-log file format questions, Miles Bader, 06:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Tom Lord, 06:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 06:02
  • [Gnu-arch-users] today's merges, Tom Lord, 05:42
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Slow mailinglist, DNS problems?, Andrew Suffield, 05:36
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] hooks and remote archives, Bruce Stephens, 05:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 04:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Collins, 04:06
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 03:51
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Some "How Do I" questions, John Goerzen, 03:49
  • [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH 0.0.1, Tez Kamihira, 03:46
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] japanese translation of the arch home page, Shun-ichi GOTO, 03:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Alan Cox-->Xouvert-->Arch, Zack Brown, 03:01
  • [Gnu-arch-users] post-commit email scripts, Miles Egan, 02:51
  • [Gnu-arch-users] centralized commit hooks, Miles Egan, 02:30
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 02:22
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tla explicit-default does not work, Pau Aliagas, 01:52
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Stephen J. Turnbull, 01:42
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Slow mailinglist, DNS problems?, Jan Harkes, 01:07
• August 21, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 23:57
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ATTN: who wants to host the wiki?, Talli Somekh, 23:50
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 22:39
  • [Gnu-arch-users] change to email list handling and merge-fest, Tom Lord, 22:24
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 21:38
  • [Gnu-arch-users] japanese translation of the arch home page, Tom Lord, 20:56
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] problem with tla on freebsd, Jan Hudec, 15:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH 0.0.1, Robert Anderson, 15:05
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Tom Lord, 11:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Collins, 09:50
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Jan Hudec, 09:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 08:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 07:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 03:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 02:56
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: arch taglines for emacs, Miles Bader, 01:14
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hooks and remote archives, Miles Bader, 00:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] problem with tla on freebsd, list-arch-users, 00:43
• August 20, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: how to tag directory using tagline?, Jan Hudec, 23:47
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: hooks and remote archives, Neil Stevens, 22:02
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Tom Lord, 20:05
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 18:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] funding free software R&D, Tom Lord, 18:17
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, markj, 15:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Mark A. Flacy, 05:32
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 04:43
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 04:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Ethan Benson, 04:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] making directory tags repeatable for Xouvert?, Robert Anderson, 04:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 02:47
  • [Gnu-arch-users] ViewARCH 0.0.1, Tez Kamihira, 01:41
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Collins, 01:17
• August 19, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jan Harkes, 23:13
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 20:38
  • [Gnu-arch-users] making directory tags repeatable for Xouvert?, Jonathan Walther, 18:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] tagline robustness, Tom Lord, 17:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Jim Dabell, 13:01
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Robert Anderson, 10:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: how to tag directory using tagline?, Robert Anderson, 10:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] funding free software R&D, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 09:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] how do I tag png files with tagline?, Jan Hudec, 08:51
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] funding free software R&D, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 07:55
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: how to tag directory using tagline?, Jonathan Walther, 07:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Stephen J. Turnbull, 06:34
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Ethan Benson, 06:25
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 06:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: how to tag directory using tagline?, Mark Thomas, 06:18
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Ethan Benson, 06:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Peter Conrad, 06:11
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Stephen J. Turnbull, 05:59
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 05:52
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 05:48
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: how to tag directory using tagline?, Jonathan Walther, 05:47
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Alexander Deruwe, 05:41
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: how to tag directory using tagline?, Miles Bader, 05:37
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 05:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 05:34
  • [Gnu-arch-users] how to tag directory using tagline?, Jonathan Walther, 05:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Tobias C. Rittweiler, 05:26
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Miles Bader, 05:20
  • [Gnu-arch-users] the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 04:57
  • [Gnu-arch-users] howto define dirs in =tagging-method, Pau Aliagas, 04:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Questions from a Subversion user, Florian Weimer, 04:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Jonathan Walther, 04:18
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Miles Bader, 04:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Ethan Benson, 04:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Jonathan Walther, 03:58
  • [Gnu-arch-users] how do I tag png files with tagline?, Jonathan Walther, 03:53
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Ethan Benson, 03:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Questions from a Subversion user, Jan Hudec, 03:09
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: error in tree-lint, Miles Bader, 03:07
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] error in tree-lint, Pau Aliagas, 02:03
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: file permissions in archive, Jan Hudec, 01:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Questions from a Subversion user, Stephen J. Turnbull, 01:31
• August 18, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] tagline robustness, Miles Bader, 21:45
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Alan Cox-->Xouvert-->Arch, Tupshin Harper, 20:51
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cvs <-> arch mirroring scripts, Miles Bader, 18:33
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: problem with tla on freebsd, Neil Stevens, 18:28
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] funding free software R&D, Tom Lord, 18:23
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Questions from a Subversion user, Miles Bader, 18:20
  • [Gnu-arch-users] fixing the problem of posting to the old mailing list, Jonathan Walther, 16:59
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] problem with tla on freebsd, Patrick Mauritz, 14:40
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] error in tree-lint, Tom Lord, 14:20
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Questions from a Subversion user, Tom Lord, 14:15
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Questions from a Subversion user, Bruce Stephens, 13:43
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Questions from a Subversion user, Andrew Suffield, 13:01
  • [Gnu-arch-users] error in tree-lint, Pau Aliagas, 12:47
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Questions from a Subversion user, John Goerzen, 12:16
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Questions from a Subversion user, Tom Lord, 12:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Questions from a Subversion user, Andrew Suffield, 11:59
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: Questions from a Subversion user, John Goerzen, 11:54
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Questions from a Subversion user, Robert Anderson, 11:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] bug tracker and patch tracking, Tom Lord, 11:04
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Questions from a Subversion user, John Goerzen, 10:59
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: file permissions in archive, Ethan Benson, 08:33
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Xouvert, James Michael DuPont, 06:48
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Aidan Delaney, 05:16
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Xouvert, Miles Bader, 03:09
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] bug tracker and patch tracking, Miles Bader, 00:51
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: cvs <-> arch mirroring scripts, Miles Bader, 00:12
• August 17, 2003
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: snag importing the X11 sources into arch, Miles Bader, 23:53
• August 16, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] New ArX list, Walter Landry, 22:28
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Jonathan Walther, 17:32
  • [Gnu-arch-users] bug tracker and patch tracking, Tom Lord, 13:02
  • [Gnu-arch-users] New ArX list, Walter Landry, 12:27
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [PATCH] Some message text initialization in FTP backend, Edouard Gomez, 11:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Florian Weimer, 07:36
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Andrew Suffield, 05:31
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Miles Bader, 03:08
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Tom Lord, 02:32
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Tom Lord, 01:12
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Tom Lord, 01:10
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Miles Bader, 01:00
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Tom Lord, 00:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Tom Lord, 00:30
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Miles Bader, 00:22
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Miles Bader, 00:17
• August 15, 2003
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Robert Collins, 23:49
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Tom Lord, 23:35
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Miles Bader, 23:24
  • [Gnu-arch-users] [OT] SCO vs. the world, Tom Lord, 23:15
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Re: [arch-users] Re: cvs <-> arch mirroring scripts, Tom Lord, 22:39
  • Re: [Gnu-arch-users] test + question, Tom Lord, 17:08
  • [Gnu-arch-users] test + question, wave++, 16:57
  • [Gnu-arch-users] Test thread, Edouard Gomez, 15:46
  • [Gnu-arch-users] ATTN -- gnu-arch-users message, Tom Lord, 15:29
  • [Gnu-arch-users] first test message, Tom Lord, 15:10

---

[Prev Period]

[Next Period]

---

Mail converted by MHonArc