[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging
From: |
Jonathan Walther |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Aug 2003 01:30:02 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
On Tue, Aug 26, 2003 at 12:34:44AM +0200, Federico Di Gregorio wrote:
Il lun, 2003-08-25 alle 14:15, MJ Ray ha scritto:
On 2003-08-23 04:58:04 +0100 Jonathan Walther <address@hidden>
wrote:
> Balogna. 'L' (list-reply-only) in mutt took one look at your message,
> which contained all the List-* headers, and it said "No list found!"
> Why are we expected to use bullshit software like this?
I've no idea. mutt is another email client which has no List-*
handling. Given that I thought some hackers used mutt, I was
mutt _has_ list handling. use the L key *after* configuring the lists in
your mutt rc file. it is incredible how many people on this list don't
have even the skill necessary to use google to search for a FAQ.
Maybe we are fed up with fucking with .procmailrc and .muttrc? I want
Bayesian filtering that "learns" every time I delete or move a message
to a different folder. I want an "L" command that KNOWS, all by itself,
just from looking at the headers, that it is dealing with a mailing
list, and act in a way that I have configured, maybe to reply to the
list, and maybe to reply to the original sender. There is no reason why
things can't be this way, other than a masochistic streak among the
technical elitists.
Ouch, I slammed a rock onto my toe, ow. Ouch, I slammed a rock onto my
toe. Ow. Ouch, I slammed a rock onto my toe. OWW! Dis doctah sez,
"don't do dat no mo'ah!"
Jonathan
--
It's not true unless it makes you laugh,
but you don't understand it until it makes you weep.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Geek House Productions, Ltd.
Providing Unix & Internet Contracting and Consulting,
QA Testing, Technical Documentation, Systems Design & Implementation,
General Programming, E-commerce, Web & Mail Services since 1998
Phone: 604-435-1205
Email: address@hidden
Webpage: http://reactor-core.org
Address: 2459 E 41st Ave, Vancouver, BC V5R2W2
pgps7Qz4lnrDr.pgp
Description: PGP signature
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, (continued)
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Mark A. Flacy, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/26
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 2003/08/26
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Miles Bader, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Robert Collins, 2003/08/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Miles Bader, 2003/08/27
- [Gnu-arch-users] Specifying protocols [was: the dangers of no reply-to munging], Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/27
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, MJ Ray, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging, Federico Di Gregorio, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging,
Jonathan Walther <=
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 2003/08/25
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/26
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, MJ Ray, 2003/08/22
- [Gnu-arch-users] something _interesting_ for (Re: ... no reply-to munging ...), Tom Lord, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/22
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Stephen J. Turnbull, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Jonathan Walther, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Tom Lord, 2003/08/23
- Re: [Gnu-arch-users] Re: the dangers of no reply-to munging; Xouvert update, Andrew Suffield, 2003/08/25