gnewsense-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Gnash patch for Builder


From: Sam Geeraerts
Subject: Re: [Gnewsense-dev] Gnash patch for Builder
Date: Mon, 14 Jun 2010 00:01:14 +0200
User-agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.24 (X11/20100402)

Dmitry Samoyloff schreef:
At Sun, 13 Jun 2010 21:58:32 +0200,
Sam Geeraerts wrote:
I've added Gnash tarball to the Builder to avoid putting the whole unpacked
source tree in there. To unpack it, I've used the "patch" target of the
debian/rules file, which conforms to the Debian Policy Manual, I suppose:

"This target performs whatever additional actions are required to make the
source ready for editing (unpacking additional upstream archives, applying
patches, etc.)."
My current struggles with OpenOffice.org have made me a bit skeptical about tarballs in source packages. I'm not a fan of binary diffs in VCS either. But as long as its the unmodified tarball from upstream and it works, I'm not going to be difficult about it.

I've chose to put it unpacked right because it's an unmodified upstream
tarball and it can be treated as a "constant" (it compiles fine in the
gNewSense and I doubt it have any freedom bugs, being a GNU project). The
gnote package is a tarball in the Builder also (however, it uses cdbs). I can
make Gnash unpacked easily, if you want.

Both approaches have their advantages. Debian docs say keeping the pristine source tarball is best practice [1]. We use it a little differently, but you might as well leave the tarball. The OO.o case is actually very different from this.

The newly generated repo works fine for me.
My build attempt didn't go too well:

checking for moc-qt4... /usr/bin/moc-qt4
checking for uic-qt4... /usr/bin/uic-qt4
checking for kde4-config... no
checking for KDE 4.x header path... configure: error: You specified building kde4, but you have kde3 installed!
make: *** [config-stamp] Error 1
dpkg-buildpackage: failure: debian/rules build gave error exit status 2

OK, I'll check it tomorrow.

Thanks.

[1] http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/best-pkging-practices.html#bpp-origtargz



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]