gnash-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash backport for Lenny


From: Sylvain Beucler
Subject: Re: [Gnash-dev] Gnash backport for Lenny
Date: Tue, 9 Mar 2010 22:20:51 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)

On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 10:04:06PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> 2010/3/9 Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden>:
> > Hi Miry,
> >
> > On Tue, Mar 09, 2010 at 09:15:47PM +0100, Miriam Ruiz wrote:
> >> 2010/3/9 Sylvain Beucler <address@hidden>:
> >> > I backported Gnash 0.8.7 to Lenny.
> >> > The main issue was using backported libtool2 (and libltdl).
> >> >
> >> > Would you be interested in sponsoring it to backports.org?
> >> > (when it reaches testing in 2 days?)
> >>
> >> It does not need libtool2, it compiles perfectly with litool in Lenny.
> >> Have you compiled it against kde3 or kde4?
> >
> > It didn't when I tried, somehow libtool expanded to "" (see below).
> > Does it really matter?
> 
> If I use the ./configure file that comes with the tarball it seems to
> build OK, but if I call autogen.sh beforehand in debian/rules from Lenny
> I just can't seem to be able to make it work.
> 
> I have been able to backport it by calling autogen.sh from SID and then
> keeping those changes in diff.

It sounds like ./configure would only work it it's generated by
libtool2.

> My current problem is that ti compiles with kde4 but fails to compile
> with kde3 in ./configure [1]

Do we need kde3, or kde4 under Lenny?

-- 
Sylvain

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]