[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: RTTI and embedded systems
From: |
strk |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: RTTI and embedded systems |
Date: |
Fri, 4 Aug 2006 16:48:59 +0200 |
On Fri, Aug 04, 2006 at 08:39:16AM -0600, Rob Savoye wrote:
> strk wrote:
>
> > Question is: is the -fno-rtti flag really needed ?
> > We can surely do w/out RTTI (and indeed code was w/out it before
>
> RTTI is used for exception handling in C++, which we use.
> (catch/try/throw), so I wouldn't try to pass this as a compiler flag.
Ok, so we should remove -fno-rtti addition when using --enable-embedded
--strk;
- Re: [Gnash-dev] How to compile gnash-0.7.1, yj, 2006/08/01
- Re: [Gnash-dev] How to compile gnash-0.7.1, Rob Savoye, 2006/08/01
- Re: [Gnash-dev] How to compile gnash-0.7.1, yj, 2006/08/01
- Re: [Gnash-dev] How to compile gnash-0.7.1, Rob Savoye, 2006/08/03
- Re: [Gnash-dev] How to compile gnash-0.7.1, yj, 2006/08/03
- [Gnash-dev] RTTI and embedded systems, strk, 2006/08/04
- [Gnash-dev] Re: RTTI and embedded systems, Rob Savoye, 2006/08/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: RTTI and embedded systems,
strk <=
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: RTTI and embedded systems, Rob Savoye, 2006/08/04
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: RTTI and embedded systems, yj, 2006/08/05
- Re: [Gnash-dev] Re: RTTI and embedded systems, Rob Savoye, 2006/08/05