On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 11:30 AM, Bastiaan Jacques <address@hidden> wrote:
On Sun, 1 Jun 2014, Richard Wilbur wrote:
Because I simply overlooked it. Well spotted!
Glad to help! Wish I could help with more code contributions.
I presume the main reason for not changing the other objects presently
passed by const reference is that they aren't movable?
Only one object is passed to this particular constructor, that I can
see.
You're right concerning this constructor. I was referring to several
subsequent constructors in the patch [...]