Re: [Geiser-users] ‘geiser-guile-load-path’ v s. ‘%load-compiled-path’

[Ludovic Courtès]

"Jose A. Ortega Ruiz" <address@hidden> skribis:

> On Fri, Sep 13 2013, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>
>> Howdy!
>
> [...]
>
>>> And can we share the directories in geiser-guile-load-path for both
>>> non-compiled and compiled paths or is it better to have separate lists?
>>
>> For the purposes of Geiser, I think it’s better to have a single list
>> (even for Guile itself, it’s not clear to me what having separate lists
>> buys us.)
>>
>>> We also have a command to augment %load-path while the REPL is running:
>>> would it make sense to add also the requested directory to
>>> %load-compiled-path? (having a separate command sound a bit too much,
>>> but is doable if that's the right thing to do...)
>>
>> What do you mean by “while the REPL is running”?
>
> M-x geiser-add-to-load-path

Ah, OK.

> That will ask for a directory and send a command to Guile adding it to
> %load-path.  If i understand correctly, all that's needed is to also add
> the directory to %load-compiled-path, and use the command automatically
> at Guile startup with the contents of geiser-load-path.
>
> Does that make sense?

It sure does.

Thank you!

Ludo’.