Re: [Gdbheads] proposed change to GDB maintainership rules

[Michael Snyder]

Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Andrew Cagney <address@hidden> writes:
>
>
> > > > I think this is simply dangerous - such matters should be pushed up
> > > > to
> > > > the next level.
> > >
> > > What is the next level?
> >
> > GDB steering committee, then RMS.
>
>
> As far as I can tell, there is no gdb steering committee.  See this
> web page:
>     http://sources.redhat.com/gdb/steering.html
>
> Is there some other web page I should look at?
>
> If there is a gdb steering committee, then who is on the committee,
> and how can they be contacted, and how do they make decisions?  And
> can somebody please update the above web page?

Probably because after an initial flury (sp?) of activity,
the committee sort of became a silent partner.

Did we determine that this mailing list is archived?
Because I think the list of members was sent out recently.
I believe it includes Jim Blandy, Andrew Cagney, JT Conklin,
Robert Dewar, Klee Dienes, Paul Hilfinger, Vincent Renardias,
Stan Shebs, Richard Stallman, and Todd Whitesel.
No slight intended to anyone I didn't mention.