[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Chorlton's Big Green Festival
From: |
Dave Page |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Chorlton's Big Green Festival |
Date: |
Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:02:13 +0000 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.9.9 |
On Friday 15 January 2010 16:32:30 Luke Taylor wrote:
> Surely Gnu/Linux being
> slightly more power efficient than windows doesn't count?
There's the argument that embedded Linux is significantly more efficient than
other embedded operating systems on small hardware.
There's also an argument that GNU/Linux runs better on older hardware,
prolonging its life - I know that I have old Pentium etc. systems which are
still perfectly usable with GNU/Linux.
There's a counter-argument that new hardware is more power-efficient so is
environmentally better; but there's a counter-counter-argument that that
increased efficiency is offset by the energy cost of building the new
hardware. I've not really seen any good full-lifecycle comparisons, and would
be very interested.
Dave
--
Dave Page <address@hidden>
Jabber: address@hidden
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] Chorlton's Big Green Festival, Michael Dorrington, 2010/01/21