[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] "Selling" Free software to the masses
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsuk-manchester] "Selling" Free software to the masses |
Date: |
Wed, 30 Dec 2009 20:12:25 +0000 (GMT) |
Iain Roberts wrote:
> Having spent a good chunk of the last few year promoting free & open
> source, and working with other doing the same, I'm afraid I'm not
> too optimistic about the ability of the four freedoms and the
> philsophy behind free software to appeal to a wider audience.
Don't give up yet! Freedom, fairness and sharing are still rising.
Manchester is now home to the largest consumer co-op in the world
(the Cooperative Group and Britannia Building Society merger) and
the United Nations has just proclaimed 2012 International Year of
Co-operatives.
Free software is a good embodiment of those values, as explained at
http://www.software.coop/info/coopdev.html
although I admit we rephrased the four freedoms and dropped the 0123
to make it more punchy and memorable.
[...]
> I defy anyone who's used the latest versions of MS Office to
> seriously claim that OpenOffice.org is as good (though it may be
> good enough for their needs, as it is for mine). Likewise, free
> software for editing movies and doing DTP is clearly and often
> painfully inferior to the better proprietary alternatives.
Actually, I'd go the other way. The latest version of MS Office is a
confusing garish technicolour experience for occasional users and
produces files which yet-to-upgrade MSOffice users can't read. The
use of open standards and general lack of forced upgrades is a big
selling point for free software.
Editing movies - OK, that seemed to be right last time I checked.
DTP - depends what you mean by publishing...
> To promote free software, I would concentrate on the free apps that
> genuinely offer something either better than the proprietary
> alternatives (e.g. Firefox) or that you couldn't legally improve
> without paying a significant amount of money (e.g. Gimp, Inkscape).
> Ubuntu's also worth a punt.
Do you mean that IceCat is better than Firefox, or are we ignoring
Firefox's minor non-free-software bits?
I would mention those things, but there needs to be a core of the
values of freedom and cooperative effort, else we're recruiting
fellow travellers more than supporters.
Hope that explains,
--
MJ Ray (slef) Webmaster and LMS developer at | software
www.software.coop http://mjr.towers.org.uk | .... co
IMO only: see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html | .... op