[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Fsfe-uk] suitable 2-line license for webpages?
From: |
MJ Ray |
Subject: |
Re: [Fsfe-uk] suitable 2-line license for webpages? |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:24:13 +0000 |
Ciaran O'Riordan <address@hidden>
> Verbatim copying and distribution of this entire article is permitted in
> any medium, provided this notice is preserved. Copying and distribution of
> works based on this article are permitted, provided that such works carry
> three things: (1) this copyright notice, (2) prominent notices stating the
> that it has been changed, and (3) information for how to obtain the
> original (such as a URL).
>
> Which means that people might do things with the page that I don't like, but
> at least there will always be a link to the original, and it should be clear
> that modified versions are not the original.
>
> Surely this issue has crossed other people's minds. Any comments?
I think you could combine the verbatim and modified permissions
into one by:
This article may be copied and distributed in whole or in part
in any medium, provided that this notice is preserved
and that the reproduced part is clearly marked.
I think the information for how to obtain the original is
forcing people a little much, but you could tack that on the end
if you wished, or put a URL in the copyright notice.
Hope that helps,
--
MJ Ray - personal email, see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/email.html
Work: http://www.ttllp.co.uk/ irc.oftc.net/slef Jabber/SIP ask