fsfe-uk
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Fsfe-uk] Re: [discuss] Open source software News


From: Rod Engelsman
Subject: [Fsfe-uk] Re: [discuss] Open source software News
Date: Sat, 29 May 2004 04:09:28 -0500
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7) Gecko/20040514 MultiZilla/1.6.3.2f

Timothy Baldwin wrote:
On Saturday 22 May 2004 15:03, Ralph Janke wrote:


Tom, you are absolutely right. GPL is based on the foundation of a
working copyright law. Also GPL is far less socialistic
than patents.


How do claim that patents, a form intelluctual propiery, and therefore a form of private propetry, are socialistic?

More like feudalistic in my opinion.



Free markets are working because of competition.


How can free markets be working when large numbers of people live in poverty?


In order to have price stability and innovation, it is very
helpful to have as much competition as possible.


An (democratically made) agreement to keep prices stable, should also keep prices stable. Cooperation is more efficent than competeion, how much effort is expanded by OpenOffice.org in being compatiable with Microsoft Office, and how much resources does Microsoft spend in being incompatible, or spreading FUD? Also consider the cost of developing 2 office suites instead of one.


However, even patents have their place where investments are so high,
that without a "protected" market the risk of investment is too high, and
therefore the absence of a monopoly market for some time would prevent
the development of i.e. medication that is beneficial to society.


Public funding (distrubuted on a democratic basis) would solve that.


Best solution I can think of to this problem is public funding of research, perhaps a bounty program, with private companies actually producing the resultant products in competition. All drugs would be generic this way.


Patents therefore should be used as remedy for problems that free
markets are not setup to solve, not as general applicable principle.
A general principle of ownership for a few of something that should be
able to be owned  (through copyright) by many should be called feudalism.

No, that's class society, of which capitalism and feudalism are examples.


I do not see why it can be claimed that it is socialism

What are you saying is claimed is socialism?


when competition is promoted,

Right




------------------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
Fsfe-uk mailing list
address@hidden
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/fsfe-uk





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]