RE: [fsf-community-team] A first exercise

[three]

Dennis:  
the GNU GPL absolutely allows for and encourages changes to the
software.  It's one of the "Four Freedoms" that are the Pilers of the
GPL and Free Software.  The only stipulation to the modifications are
that if you distribute it to anyone else you do so under the GPL and
that you make the source code available to the next person just as it
was made available to you.  

Justin "threethirty" O'Brien
 Member 0 [NHI]
 http://numberedhumanindustries.com
 @threethirty - twitter/identi.ca/jaiku
 ---------------- Pod/Ogg Casts -----------------
 LinuxCranks - http://linuxcranks.info
 Free Linux Helpline - http://freelinuxhelpline.net
 The Linux Link Tech Show - http://tllts.org
 Something Kinda Techy - http://somethingkindatechy.org
 Hacker Public Radio - http://hackerpublicradio.org
 ------------------------------------------------
 ** This message is intentionally short please see
http://three.sentenc.es/ for explanation.**

> -------- Original Message --------
> Subject: [fsf-community-team] A first exercise
> From: Holmes Wilson <address@hidden>
> Date: Tue, December 15, 2009 7:49 am
> To: FSF Community Team <address@hidden>
> 
> 
> Hey everyone,
> 
> Here's a good example of something we'd like this list to respond to. 
> People often send FSF emails pointing to blog posts that require some 
> kind of response from the free software community.
> 
> This is a particularly good example, because it's not even the case that 
> somebody's especially antagonistic to the ideas of free software-- 
> they're just kinda lost ;)
> 
> Have a look this article and propose a response to the list.  I think in 
> this case it would be good to draft both a comment and a short note to 
> the author to his own email address or through a contact form (can 
> somebody get this?).
> 
> Try to keep it clear, concise, and polite.  No cruft!  Let's discuss the 
> best response here first before sending it through... we'd like to do 
> things this way while we're getting started.
> 
> Also, some pretty heavy discussion kicked up over the weekend and we've 
> had some unsubscribe requests.  I think that's natural since this will 
> be a very active list (and people will obviously have their own 
> questions and ideas about how best to explain free software, for 
> example) but we should be careful to keep things productive.  This will 
> be a lot easier when we have more work to do :)
> 
> So let's focus on this dry run and see how it goes.
> 
> -Holmes
> 
>  > *CNet blog Network* writer Dennis O'Reilly makes several erroneous
>  > statements in his 20 Oct 2009
>  > article<http://news.cnet.com/8301-13880_3-10378605-68.html>  titled
>  > 'Finding the Catch in Free Software'. Most glaring among his 
> mis-statements
>  > is:
>  >> The GNU GPL stipulates that the software can be used, copied, and
>  >> distributed verbatim without limitation, though it cannot be changed.
>  >
>  > The guy claims to have been writing about tech since 1985,&  will
>  > presumably continue writing for some time. Would FSF be interested in
>  > undertaking an effort to improve O'Reilly's understanding of FLOSS?
>  >