|
From: | suzuki toshiya |
Subject: | Re: how update the website for the complex layout |
Date: | Wed, 19 May 2021 14:20:05 +0900 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1 |
Oh, sorry for my poor wording.
What exactly do you mean with a 'more general framework'?
If my memory is correct, HarfBuzz was started as the one of the infrastructure for the Pango. When it was started, there were other non-HarfBuzz OpenType drivers, like Qt, like ICU, etc. Maybe there were more. But now, the major players like Qt and ICU had changed to HarfBuzz. So I feel HarfBuzz had grown as more general framework, in comparison with its beginning. But anyway, your pointing out "HarfBuzz is a text shaping library, not a text layout library" is important for the people looking for "text layout framework showing vertical glyphs in vertical writing mode". Maybe a simple mention on HarfBuzz is a misleading info, like, giving a flour to a person looking for a bread. I withdraw my proposal to replace the mention on Pango by the mention on HarfBuzz. More elaboration is needed. Regards, mpsuzuki On 2021/05/19 13:58, Werner LEMBERG wrote:
As a quick fix, I want to propose the additional item to FAQ. [...]Thanks, I've added this (with modifications) to the FAQ. I also took the opportunity to update the layout of the FAQ to be similar to the rest of the FreeType 2 documentation.BTW, I wonder whether current last answer referring Pango should be improved by referring HarfBuzz. Yes, Pango is still essential part of GTK+, but HarfBuzz is becoming more general framework broader than GTK+. How do you feel?What exactly do you mean with a 'more general framework'? HarfBuzz is a text shaping library; it is not meant to actually do text layout. I think the following library stack is still valid: FreeType → HarfBuzz → Pango → Cairo Of course, there are alternatives like FreeType → HarfBuzz → Qt Please make further suggestions how to improve the FAQ!I would consider the additional text to add the vertical metrics discussion in later.Thanks in advance! Werner
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |