Re: [Freebangfont-devel] Khanda-ta and Ra-Yaphala

[Kaushik Ghose]

> As I shown in the previous picture (see
> www.geocities.com/mitra_anirban/khandata.jpg ) that
> ta_hasanta_ikaar_ta can be rendered using Andy's proposition by
> entering ta+hasanta+zwj+zwnj+ta+ikaar. With present specification
> you have to enter this same input to write more common occurance of
> Khandata_ikaar_ta. 

>From my understanding of the current unicode specs khandata-ikaar-ta would
have the following underlying code

ta-hashonto-zwj-ta-hoshoi

Is the sequence xx-zwj-zwnj legal ?

-kg