Re: [POLL] Naming of "export features"

[No Wayman]

> Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:
>
> I am looking at the concept again, and I feel that we may be 
> missing
> some flexibility here. I do not like the fact that each feature 
> can only
> have a simple implementation within specific backend.

Agreed

> What I have in mind is an ability to parametrize the transcoders

This seems like a step in the right direction.