[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Dates in headlines
From: |
Max Nikulin |
Subject: |
Re: Dates in headlines |
Date: |
Sat, 28 Jan 2023 15:12:27 +0700 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.4.2 |
On 19/08/2022 12:58, Ihor Radchenko wrote:
Ypo writes:
I found it again:
"If the headline contains a timestamp, it is removed from the link,
which results in a wrong link—you should avoid putting a timestamp in
the headline."
https://orgmode.org/manual/Handling-Links.html#FOOT28
Unless I miss something, this footnote is plain wrong. The timestamps
are not removed. At least not when I run M-x org-store-link on a
headline with timestamp with emacs -Q.
I have realized that "first wins" parsing principle (consider +a =b+
c*d=) may mean a problem for timestamp at the end of link text. So
[[file:test.txt][Test [2023-01-28 Sat]]]
requires a zero-width space after the bracket closing the timestamp. The
same is applicable to fuzzy link to headings. So either
[[*Heading \[2023-01-28 Sat\]][Heading [2023-01-28 Sat]]]
ZWS in between--------------------------------------------^^
or
[[*Heading \[2023-01-28 Sat\]]]
should be used. `org-insert-link' handles it correctly, but when typing
links from keyboard, users should be aware of such kind of pitfall. So
timestamps in headings may be source of some inconvenience.
May it happen that in some old Org version timestamps at the end of
headings were removed due by code intended to handle statistics cookie
[1/10]?
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: Dates in headlines,
Max Nikulin <=