emacs-orgmode
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Line breaks and brackets in LaTeX export


From: Max Nikulin
Subject: Re: Line breaks and brackets in LaTeX export
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2022 00:07:54 +0700
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.2.2

For a while I have the following question. Is \\{} have the same
effect on tabularray parser as \\\empty?

Throw an error before \hline.

It is possible to use
     \begin{tblr}[expand=\empty]{rl}
but I would prefer to reserve such feature for a more nobble purpose.

I've had a
first look at tabularray.sty, but I'm not familiar enough with the new
LaTeX 3 syntax and, frankly, I'm lost...

While it is not easy for me to read code LaTeX2e core and packages, I should say that I have no guess at all when I am looking at tabularray sources. It is a completely different language.

I have started a discussion requesting for a \\-like command without optional arguments. Maybe somebody will suggest a better workaround instead.
https://github.com/lvjr/tabularray/discussions/321

I've tried all the packages involved in tables that I can think of
(longtable, siunitx, tabularx, booktabs, array, and I don't know if I
forgot any) and in all of them the \empty solution works fine. It seems
that tabularray is the black sheep here.

I think tabularray is unique with a regexp-based parser. I had a hope that new approach does not allow newline between \\ and its arguments, but unfortunately compatibility with older code is preserved in this aspect.

From LaTeX companion I remember supertabular as an alternative for longtable, but I am unsure if it is alive yet.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]