[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Suggestions for improved suffix parsing in oc-biblatex
From: |
Nicolas Goaziou |
Subject: |
Re: Suggestions for improved suffix parsing in oc-biblatex |
Date: |
Tue, 28 Sep 2021 13:41:38 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) |
Hello,
Bastien <bzg@gnu.org> writes:
> Denis Maier <denismaier@mailbox.org> writes:
>
>> I think the suffix parsing in oc-biblatex could be improved.
>
> Can you provide a patch for this?
I don't think this improvement is needed. We could get away with it in
most cases using, e.g., global suffix:
[cite:@doe 4; with some more text]
Note the example above is not supported yet, but it might be a more
sensible development than
[cite:@doe {4}, with some more text]
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
- Suggestions for improved suffix parsing in oc-biblatex, Denis Maier, 2021/09/08
- Re: Suggestions for improved suffix parsing in oc-biblatex, Denis Maier, 2021/09/20
- Re: Suggestions for improved suffix parsing in oc-biblatex, Bastien, 2021/09/26
- Re: Suggestions for improved suffix parsing in oc-biblatex,
Nicolas Goaziou <=
- Re: Suggestions for improved suffix parsing in oc-biblatex, Bruce D'Arcus, 2021/09/28
- Re: Suggestions for improved suffix parsing in oc-biblatex, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/09/29
- Re: Suggestions for improved suffix parsing in oc-biblatex, Denis Maier, 2021/09/29
- Re: Suggestions for improved suffix parsing in oc-biblatex, Nicolas Goaziou, 2021/09/30
- Re: Suggestions for improved suffix parsing in oc-biblatex, Denis Maier, 2021/09/30