Re: [wip-cite-new] New natbib processor

[Denis Maier]

Am 05.05.2021 um 23:25 schrieb Bruce D'Arcus:
> On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 2:08 PM Bruce D'Arcus <bdarcus@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I did some basic testing, and it seems to work well in general ...
>
> That was just looking at the citation output, of course.
>
> Now I did the real test: would LaTeX -> PDF work.
>
> Answer: not ATM.
>
> Here's my minimal document:
>
> ----
> [cite/text/alt:see ;@mann-68]
>
> [cite//alt/caps:@mann-68]
>
> [cite//full:@mann-68]
>
> [cite//caps:@mann-68]
>
> #+cite_export: natbib
> #+bibliography: test.bib
> ----
>
> ... but when I run the export, I get an "undefined citation" error.
>
> The key is correct, as is the file name, which is in the same directly
> as the test file.
>
> What am I missing?

Bruce has sent me his test files, and it turned out to be the bibstyle 
(humannat), which apparently isn't included in current tex distributions.
Question: I can't see why this style should be used according to the 
minimal example Bruce has shared. Is this style added as the default 
style by the exporter? Or did you, Bruce, specify it somewhere?

Denis