[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Some projects
From: |
Matt Lundin |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Some projects |
Date: |
Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:57:36 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130014 (Ma Gnus v0.14) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Aaron Ecay <address@hidden> writes:
>
> - There is a difference between citations as done by latex/bibtex/etc.,
> and those done in every other format (handled through CSL). Assuming
> latex users want to keep their native processing rather than
> delegating to CSL, we need to solve the myriad small inconsistencies
> between these two tools. I think this is an area where it’s important
> to get things right: users of citations generally have exacting
> requirements. “Approximately Chicago-style” or “almost MLA” aren’t
> worth anything.
In my recollection, pandoc can juggle between CSL and biblatex. From the
pandoc manual:
,----
| --biblatex
|
| Use biblatex for citations in LaTeX output. This option is not for
| use with the pandoc-citeproc filter or with PDF output. It is
| intended for use in producing a LaTeX file that can be processed with
| pdflatex and bibtex or biber.
`----
Perhaps someone with more experience of pandoc could assess how well it
toggles between CSL and biblatex, especially for more complicated styles
(e.g., Chicago).
Matt
- Re: [O] Some projects, (continued)
- Re: [O] Some projects, Matt Price, 2015/10/28
- Re: [O] Some projects, Matt Price, 2015/10/27
- Re: [O] Some projects, Rainer M Krug, 2015/10/27
- Re: [O] Some projects, Rasmus, 2015/10/27
- Re: [O] Some projects, Ista Zahn, 2015/10/27
- Re: [O] Some projects, Rasmus Pank Roulund, 2015/10/27
- Re: [O] Some projects, Ista Zahn, 2015/10/27
- Re: [O] Some projects, Rainer M Krug, 2015/10/27
- Re: [O] Some projects, Matt Lundin, 2015/10/27
- Re: [O] Some projects, Richard Lawrence, 2015/10/27
Re: [O] Some projects,
Matt Lundin <=
Re: [O] Some projects, Eric Abrahamsen, 2015/10/26
Re: [O] Some projects, Kaushal Modi, 2015/10/26