[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] org-cite and org-citeproc
From: |
Nick Dokos |
Subject: |
Re: [O] org-cite and org-citeproc |
Date: |
Tue, 31 Mar 2015 15:34:54 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
Richard Lawrence <address@hidden> writes:
> However, there are a couple of other scenarios to think about:
>
> 1) Some people may still need to use plain BibTeX. Generating LaTeX
> that is intended to be processed with BibTeX, as opposed to BibLaTeX, is
> a little trickier, because (IIUC) BibTeX does not support multi-cite
> citations.
I know next to nothing about citations in general, so please bear with
me: if multi-cite support means being able to condense citations (e.g.
[1-3, 5, 9]), then bibtex can do at least some of that
(e.g. http://texblog.org/2007/05/28/mulitple-reference-citation/).
> Also, I don't know how easy it would be to capture the other
> features of citations (e.g., the in-text vs. parenthetical distinction)
> without relying on a package like natbib. If generating
> BibTeX-compatible LaTeX is needed, is it OK to rely on such a package?
>
IMO yes.
Nick