Re: [O] Citation syntax: a revised proposal

[Nicolas Goaziou]

Rasmus <address@hidden> writes:

> Perhaps the difference is too subtle.  Note that you would never deal with
> a `citation' other than through a mapping.

Hmm. I still find `citations/citation' pair confusing. What about
`citation/part'?

> Right, I was trying *to add* support for address@hidden; ⋯;@kN].

Please don't. Let's keep shortcuts simple.

> I was talking about paring [cite: pre @k post] as 
>
>
>     (citation (:begin n :end N
>                :cites
>                 '((cite (:key key :begin n1 :end N1 :prefix pre :suffix 
> post)))))
>
> And not:
>
>     (citation (:begin n :end N :prefix pre :suffix post
>                :cites '((cite (:key key :begin n1 :end N1)))))
>
> Perhaps I'm worrying about things that need not be worried about.

The latter would be obtained with

  [cite: pre; @k; post]


Regards,