Re: [O] [PATCH] Process hlines in imported tables

[Sebastien Vauban]

Hi Eric,

"Sebastien Vauban" wrote:
> Eric Schulte wrote:
>> I would agree that this (meaning raw implies scalar) should either occur
>> for all languages or for none.
>
> I think this is something interesting, but I wonder now if we wouldn't loose
> more than we would win. I mean: how would one be able to output a real "raw"
> result, then, that is one where pipes are not interpreted as table field
> separator which have to be aligned in some specific way.
>
> Do we need another argument for that?
>
> I mean: at the end, raw should really be raw (no interpretation). If we want
> some cycling for table alignment purpose (BTW, do you have lots of such code
> blocks?), maybe it'd be better to introduce a `cycle' argument or so?

I think that this portion of my post has been ignored in your answers -- which
I still have to carefully look at.

Though, I don't think the above question should stay unanswered: if you now
"cycle" on all "raw" results, how do we insert real "raw" results for which we
don't want any interpretation (not even cycling tables, or what you be
confounded as tables)?

Best regards,
  Seb

-- 
Sebastien Vauban