[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] Tables for attendance lists - A problem understanding TBLFM?
From: |
Michael Brand |
Subject: |
Re: [O] Tables for attendance lists - A problem understanding TBLFM? |
Date: |
Tue, 9 Apr 2013 14:41:17 +0200 |
Hi Gunnar
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Gunnar Wolf <address@hidden> wrote:
> #+tblfm: @address@hidden'(length
> '($3..$7))::@6$2=vmean($3..$7);%.2f::@address@hidden'(length
> '(@address@hidden))::@6$8=vmean(@address@hidden);%.2f
I would use
#+TBLFM: $8 = vlen($3..$7) :: @>$2 = vmean($3..$7); E %.2f ::
@>$3..@>$7 = vlen(@address@hidden) :: @>$8 = vmean(@address@hidden); E %.2f
or
#+TBLFM: $8 = vlen($3..$7) :: @>$2 = vmean($3..$7) +.0; E f-2 ::
@>$3..@>$7 = vlen(@address@hidden) :: @>$8 = vmean(@address@hidden) +.0; E f-2
For +.0 and f-2 see
http://orgmode.org/worg/org-faq.html#table-float-fraction
Michael
- Re: [O] Tables for attendance lists - A problem understanding TBLFM?, (continued)
- Re: [O] Tables for attendance lists - A problem understanding TBLFM?, Gunnar Wolf, 2013/04/09
- Re: [O] Tables for attendance lists - A problem understanding TBLFM?, Nick Dokos, 2013/04/09
- Re: [O] Tables for attendance lists - A problem understanding TBLFM?, Gunnar Wolf, 2013/04/09
- Re: [O] Tables for attendance lists - A problem understanding TBLFM?, Michael Brand, 2013/04/09
- Re: [O] Tables for attendance lists - A problem understanding TBLFM?, Michael Brand, 2013/04/09
- Re: [O] Tables for attendance lists - A problem understanding TBLFM?, Nick Dokos, 2013/04/09
- Re: [O] Tables for attendance lists - A problem understanding TBLFM?, Gunnar Wolf, 2013/04/09
Re: [O] Tables for attendance lists - A problem understanding TBLFM?,
Michael Brand <=