[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD
From: |
Eric S Fraga |
Subject: |
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD |
Date: |
Wed, 13 Feb 2013 09:15:21 +1030 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:
[...]
> Pray explain why Carsten appears in the followup post and you yourself
> don't figure in it.
Jambunathan,
I cannot speak for Carsten. In my case, if I send an email to the list,
I would expect following responses to go to that list as well; I don't
need to get the emails directly addressed to me as I subscribe to the
list.
I realise that this is possibly non-intuitive based on normal practice
for non-mailing list emails but, for a list, I think this is the best
default as it makes it easy to respond to a list as opposed to the
individual.
I tell gnus I am subscribed to this list and it takes care of setting
the headers for me. I have only customised the following two variables:
#+begin_src emacs-lisp
(setq
message-subscribed-address-functions '(gnus-find-subscribed-addresses)
message-subscribed-addresses '("address@hidden" "address@hidden")
)
#+end_src
If there is a consensus on the list that I am going against some form of
etiquette for this list, I am happy to change my settings. I have no
interest in annoying people!
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga, GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D
: in Emacs 24.3.50.1 and Org 7.9.3e-988-g1f8c8d
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, (continued)
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Samuel Wales, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Rainer Stengele, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Evan Misshula, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Daniel Clemente, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Thomas S. Dye, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD,
Eric S Fraga <=
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Bastien, 2013/02/13
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Bastien, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/11