[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD
From: |
Jambunathan K |
Subject: |
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD |
Date: |
Tue, 12 Feb 2013 11:59:13 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eric S Fraga <address@hidden> writes:
> Jambunathan K <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Why are you fudging with Mail Followup headers? Please don't
>> underestimate the confusion it creates for others.
>
> I believe that most people expect responses to a mailing list email to
> be directed to that list.
Pray explain why Carsten appears in the followup post and you yourself
don't figure in it.
When I send a wide reply - S W in (gnus) - my response would have been
sent "To" to Carsten. Precisely this is what I see in my Gnus buffer.
,---- Reply buffer
| To: "Dominik, Carsten" <address@hidden>
| Cc: "address@hidden List" <address@hidden>
| Subject: Re: OT, but not really: todays XKCD
| Gcc: nnfolder+archive:sent.2013-02
| From: Jambunathan K <address@hidden>
`----
,---- Article buffer
| Mail-Followup-To: Jambunathan K <address@hidden>, "Dominik, Carsten"
| <address@hidden>, "address@hidden List"
| <address@hidden>
`----
> I am sorry you have found this confusing.
I will continue to be confused, unless an explanation is in order. I
have noticed this consistently with your mails in the past.
--
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, (continued)
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Samuel Wales, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Rainer Stengele, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Evan Misshula, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Daniel Clemente, 2013/02/12
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Thomas S. Dye, 2013/02/11
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Jambunathan K, 2013/02/11
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD,
Jambunathan K <=
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/12
- Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Bastien, 2013/02/13
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Bastien, 2013/02/12
Re: [O] OT, but not really: todays XKCD, Eric S Fraga, 2013/02/11