Re: [O] Compilation problem

[Bastien]

Achim Gratz <address@hidden> writes:

> Bastien writes:
>> Achim Gratz <address@hidden> writes:
>>> That would be commit 830a0781a6 by Jambunathan, then.  Autoloads really
>>> don't work that way, so could this please be reverted?
>>
>> Done.
>
> Thank you.
>
> By way of explanation: autoload knows about a handful of "special"
> constructs.  If you put an autoload cookie on any other sexp, it will be
> copied verbatim into the autoload file.  This comes in handy sometimes,
> but the sexp may not make any sense in that context…

Yes.  On top of that, I think these functions do not need to be
autoloaded anyway.  

-- 
 Bastien