Re: [O] A manuscript on "reproducible research" introducing org-mode

[Thomas S. Dye]

Samuel Wales <address@hidden> writes:

> As a followup to my last comment, this explains how Stapel
> fooled almost everybody and kept raw data hidden:
>
>   
> http://chronicle.com/blogs/percolator/the-fraud-who-fooled-almost-everyone/27917
>
> And NYT "Fraud Case Seen as a Red Flag for Psychology
> Research" which has a raw data take:
>
>   
> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/03/health/research/noted-dutch-psychologist-stapel-accused-of-research-fraud.html
>
> Thanks for the videos, Stephen, I will check them out.
>
> I have been running across scads of fraud stories and interesting
> studies on conflict of interest, reliability of research results, etc.
>  It's all over the place, just scattered and nobody pays much
> attention, perhaps not wanting to believe it.
>
> Reproducible research aims directly at this stuff.  Chapeau!
>
> Samuel
I just ran across this article on reproducible research that some of you
might find interesting.

http://journal.r-project.org/archive/2011-2/RJournal_2011-2_Lundholm.pdf

All the best,
Tom
-- 
Thomas S. Dye
http://www.tsdye.com