[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again...
From: |
Sebastian Rose |
Subject: |
Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again... |
Date: |
Sun, 03 Oct 2010 02:46:43 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
"Eric Schulte" <address@hidden> writes:
> "Eric Schulte" <address@hidden> writes:
> To illustrate my suggestions, I've thrown together a couple simple Babel
> tests roughly following this outline, currently up in the
> `schulte-testing' branch of the Org-mode repo.
>
> To try it out
> 1) load the testing/org-test.el file
> 2) run `org-load-tests' to load up the entire org-mode test suite
> 3) run `ert' to run the test suite.
> 4) or jump to the definition of `org-babel-get-src-block-info' and run
> `org-test-current-function' to just run the tests for that function
>
> Best -- Eric
Yes. I know how running tests looks like: It looks good :)
Hahaa, I like that code. It looks so simple :)
To load all files below testing/ is a good suggestion probably. The
unloading and loading as I implemented it is simply superfluous, if we
suggest that testers no how to eval a buffer or defun (and if they can
change it, they can eval it).
* Question:
(defun org-test-current-function ()
"Test the current function."
(interactive)
(ert (car (which-function))))
`org-test-test-current-defun' in the ert-testing branch does that, too.
(But with that superfluous loading/unloading stuff though :-/) But it
encloses each test inside save-excursion and Co.
What does which-func.el that this function does not:
<#part type="application/emacs-lisp" disposition=inline>
(defun org-test-which-func ()
"Return the name of the current defun."
(save-excursion
(save-match-data
(end-of-line)
(beginning-of-defun)
(if (looking-at "(defun[[:space:]]+\\([^([:space:]]*\\)[[:space:]]*(")
(match-string-no-properties 1)
(error "No defun found around point.")))))
<#/part>
??
* Keymap
We should add keys to the org-mode-map.
C-c t
is still free here. Or is it in you use it for babel somehow?
C-c t f org-test-test-current-function
C-c t b org-test-test-current-buffer-file
* ERT Selectors
I see a little namespace problem coming up. Imagine testing org.el.
Which ert selector would we use?
"^org" ??? :-/
Should we create hashes of filenames as selectors (just kidding)?
Or use the entire filename "^org.el"? The relative path
"^lisp/org.el"?
* About the directory structure:
It does not burden the user, as tests are loaded and executed
automatically (per function, per file or all, depending on the command
used). But imagine the entire thing grows and someone would add tests
for all the stuff in emacs/lisp/. Or add tests files for single
functions simply because there is so much to test that one file would
be hard to handle.
This could cause a lot of clutter.
Is this too hypothetical? Hmmm - it might be...
If you checkout ert-testing, eval testing/org-test.el and do
M-x org-test-edit-buffer-file-tests
you're in your test file in the correct directory (which is created if
it doesn't exist).
M-x org-test-edit-current-defuns-tests
creates a file named after the defun you're in. You'll need to be in
an elisp file of course. The testing/ directory will resemble the
directory structure of the project.
Every one who saw that directory structure simply asked "don't you
think it's overkill?" :D I'll probably drop that.
We could go on on two rails for a while. I'll need this week to dig
deeper into ERT and come to conclusions.
It would be a good thing if we could agree about the keys and the
selectors (again: "^org"), so that it's painless to switch branches ;)
Sebastian
- [Orgmode] Testing --- again..., Sebastian Rose, 2010/10/01
- [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Carsten Dominik, 2010/10/02
- [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Sebastian Rose, 2010/10/02
- [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Sebastian Rose, 2010/10/02
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Eric Schulte, 2010/10/02
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Sebastian Rose, 2010/10/02
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Eric Schulte, 2010/10/02
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Eric Schulte, 2010/10/02
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again...,
Sebastian Rose <=
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Eric Schulte, 2010/10/03
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Sebastian Rose, 2010/10/03
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Eric Schulte, 2010/10/04
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Sebastian Rose, 2010/10/04
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Eric Schulte, 2010/10/05
- [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Bernt Hansen, 2010/10/05
- [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Eric Schulte, 2010/10/05
- Re: [Orgmode] Re: Testing --- again..., Sebastian Rose, 2010/10/02