[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Possible bugs

From: Bastien
Subject: Re: [Emacs-orgmode] Possible bugs
Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 17:20:27 +0100
User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)

Carsten Dominik <address@hidden> writes:

> FOr the coming release I have generalized the emphasis part very much
> and allowed to configure the regular expression for emphasis matching.

Works far better for me like this.  I don't see any relevant
improvement to org-emphasis-regexp-components.  (BTW, I've made
org-blog to use org-emph-re instead of org-bold-re and the like.)

Trying to customize org-emphasis-alist to use strike-through
fontification, i've been manually setting this:

(setq org-emphasis-alist
  '(("*" bold "<b>" "</b>")
    ("/" italic "<i>" "</i>")
    ("_" underline "<u>" "</u>")
    ("=" shadow "<code>" "</code>")
    ("+" (:strike-through t) "<code>" "</code>")))

Which works great.

But doing the same from M-x customize-variable RET org-emphasis-alist
does not work, since (:strike-through t) is not recognize here as a

> This is already on my list, but takes longer because headline matching
> happens in a million places in the Org-mode code, in many different
> ways.  For me personally, this is usually not a problem  because I
> like to indent text under a headline

Same for me - till i needed to write the org file for org-blog ;)

>> * The ?" char acceptable in links, which sometimes produces strange
>>   results.

If someone quotes a link "http://like.this"; then the last `"' is
fontified as part of the link.

> You should never have both in a buffer, just one is allowed.  The
> result of putting both is not well defined.

Okay.  Using both was quite natural to me, and no strange behavior so

> Any gnus expert around here?  I have not idea why and how this might
> happen.

I'm not a Gnus expert but i'll try to track down this bug further.  
I let you know.

> What is an image buffer?  I buffer visiting a (for example) .jpg
> file? 

Yes.  IMHO org-store-link in such a buffer should only store the
*file*, without inserting the image itself in the link.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]