[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tree-sitter maturity
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: Tree-sitter maturity |
Date: |
Tue, 24 Dec 2024 14:32:10 +0200 |
> From: Richard Stallman <rms@gnu.org>
> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
> Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 23:52:43 -0500
>
> Ideally, users should be able install the grammars separately, perhaps
> using their `make install' or `apt', and Emacs would only use them
> where they normally get installed. That is ideal because it is not
> very integrated -- it preserves modularity. In particular, it assures
> that the details of how they get installed are not a direct concern of
> Emacs maintenance.
Emacs needs to be built with the tree-sitter library to support the
modes based on it, and the grammar library needs to be installed. If
Emacs was built without tree-sitter, or if the grammar required for a
mode is not installed, the mode will display a warning to that effect.
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/17
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/18
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/18
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/19
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Björn Bidar, 2024/12/20
- Message not available
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/20
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Björn Bidar, 2024/12/22
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Richard Stallman, 2024/12/23
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Xiyue Deng, 2024/12/24
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Richard Stallman, 2024/12/25
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/12/27
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/27
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Daniel Colascione, 2024/12/27
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/12/27
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Daniel Colascione, 2024/12/27
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/12/27
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/12/27
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Richard Stallman, 2024/12/28