[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Tree-sitter maturity
From: |
Yuan Fu |
Subject: |
Re: Tree-sitter maturity |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Dec 2024 14:11:51 -0800 |
> On Nov 23, 2024, at 6:10 PM, Björn Bidar <bjorn.bidar@thaodan.de> wrote:
>
> Peter Oliver <p.d.oliver@mavit.org.uk> writes:
>
>> On Wed, 20 Nov 2024, Stefan Kangas wrote:
>>
>>> From my point of view, we are still in early days when it comes to the
>>> new tree-sitter modes. For starters, we do not recommend them by
>>> default, and some language modes are also not yet ready for prime-time.
>>> I'm not even sure that a majority of distros ship the feature in a
>>> useful form yet, but I didn't really check.
>>
>> It depends on what you mean by useful. In Fedora, for example, Emacs is
>> built with Tree-sitter, but each user has to (ask Emacs to) download and
>> compile each parser as they go along.
>>
>> If any Fedora packagers read this and would like to help with
>> packaging the parsers used by Emacs, that would be welcome. The
>> tracking bug is https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2258924
>
> Feel free to take a look into the RPM packaging I created for SUSE.
> There should be a way to collaborate on that if anyone is interested. [1]
>
> Using that packaging all the user has to do is to install the required
> grammar they want.
>
>> It’s also worth noting that Tree-sitter itself is somewhat immature; the
>> developers say that until it reaches version 1.0, we should be wary of
>> potentially unannounced incompatible changes (although they are trying
>> harder to avoid this, over time).
>
>
> [1] https://build.opensuse.org/package/show/editors/tree-sitter
I wonder if we can formalize a way for tree-sitter major modes to state the
compatible version of language grammar it uses. Maybe a package.el cookies, or
a variable that set, or even just comments in the beginning of the file.
Many major modes already adds entries to treesit-language-source-alist, that
could be a good option too.
I especially want built-in major modes to give a version, so that packagers can
package Emacs with the right version of tree-sitter grammar. I know Eli has
problems with pinning a grammar version for builtin modes before, but I wonder
what’s he’s stance now?
Yuan
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity,
Yuan Fu <=
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/18
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/18
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/19
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Björn Bidar, 2024/12/20
- Message not available
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Yuan Fu, 2024/12/20
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Björn Bidar, 2024/12/22
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Richard Stallman, 2024/12/23
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Eli Zaretskii, 2024/12/24
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Xiyue Deng, 2024/12/24
- Re: Tree-sitter maturity, Richard Stallman, 2024/12/25