[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rms
From: |
Philip Kaludercic |
Subject: |
Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ? |
Date: |
Mon, 26 Feb 2024 07:44:30 +0000 |
Jeremy Bryant <jb@jeremybryant.net> writes:
> I would like to recommend the package 'rmsbolt' for NonGNU ELPA and
> volunteer for any required changes.
>
> The author is Jay Kamat, who as I understand is potentially supportive
> if the changes are minimal (and I am volunteering for these.)
Minimal as in "small diff" or "small effort"?
> 1. What is it?
> "A supercharged implementation of the
> [[https://github.com/mattgodbolt/compiler-explorer][godbolt
> compiler-explorer]] for Emacs.
>
> RMSbolt tries to make it easy to see what your compiler is doing. It does this
> by showing you the assembly output of a given source code file. It also
> highlights which source code a given assembly block corresponds to, and vice
> versa. It supports more types of languages than any previous tool of its kind.
> "
Sounds interesting. I suppose the joke here is that RMS is God?
> It is currently hosted on gitlab and distributed on MELPA.
Could you provide a URL?
> 2. License
> From reading nongnu.elpa.git's README.org
>
> The package displays its License, which is Affero.
> Is the GNU Affero license considered suitable for NonGNU ELPA?
Yes, it should be.
>
> 3. Other
> I believe it follows the other requirements.
>
>
> WDYT?
--
Philip Kaludercic on peregrine
- NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ?, Jeremy Bryant, 2024/02/25
- Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ?,
Philip Kaludercic <=
- Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ?, Jeremy Bryant, 2024/02/26
- Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ?, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/02/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ?, Jay Kamat, 2024/02/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ?, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/02/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ?, Jay Kamat, 2024/02/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ?, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/02/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ?, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ?, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/02/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ?, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/27
- Re: NonGNU ELPA: Conditions for accepting a potential new package 'rmsbolt' ?, Philip Kaludercic, 2024/02/27