[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Code for cond*
From: |
Richard Stallman |
Subject: |
Re: Code for cond* |
Date: |
Wed, 21 Feb 2024 22:05:53 -0500 |
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider ]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> - Whether the "lax"ness applies only to the final cdr.
> - Whether the "lax"ness applies also to the (final) cdrs of nested lists.
> Any evidence to substantiate this wild claim that your choices (which
> answer yes to both questions, AFAICT) are The Right Ones?
If you raise the question without insulting anyone or and without
presuming I'm wrong, I will respond without insulting anyone and
without presuming I'm right.
--
Dr Richard Stallman (https://stallman.org)
Chief GNUisance of the GNU Project (https://gnu.org)
Founder, Free Software Foundation (https://fsf.org)
Internet Hall-of-Famer (https://internethalloffame.org)
- Re: Code for cond*, (continued)
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/03
- Re: Code for cond*, Emanuel Berg, 2024/02/03
- Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/02/03
- Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/02/03
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/04
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/12
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/12
- Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/02/14
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/14
- Re: Code for cond*,
Richard Stallman <=
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/21
- Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/02/24
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/25
- Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/02/28
- Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/29
- Re: Code for cond*, Richard Stallman, 2024/02/28
Re: Code for cond*, Stefan Monnier, 2024/02/12