Re: Code for cond*

[Emanuel Berg]

Stefan Monnier wrote:

> What have it tried to implement using the macro facility you
> designed for your patterns? Have you tried to implement, say
> the `map` pattern we have in `map.el` or the
> `cl-struct` pattern?

`map', a `pcase-defmacro'. Or `cl-struct'.

To implement cond*, an interface introduced because `pcase'
and `cl-lib' were two interfaces too many; and, as an
alternative to pcase because pcase has made Elisp too
difficult to maintain - which is also what cl-lib has done
to Elisp.

A clever move!

But can cond* regain the initiative?

-- 
underground experts united
https://dataswamp.org/~incal